1 Like
So basically they screwed up the A3 even more and didn’t even link the right ammo to the ingame ammo selector but changed the ammo selector name.
Hilarious 😂
1 Like
No no the normal SEP has it, i think its just the V2 thats bugged
1 Like
The side composites as well?
Edit, I am dumb and forgot what we were talking about already. My bad.
If you equip TUSK M829A3 changes to A2¸
Edit,
TUSK
Without TUSK
Yup, TUSK is bugged
9 Likes
… so maybe AI will finally fix war thunder when it takes over.
Cannot safely facepalm hard enough without risking serious injury
This update is getting more and more hilarious by the hour. The amount of bugs that have crept up in the live server is honestly embarrassing.
Im honestly surprised antirad missiles and mitl works really well and without annoying bugs tho.
At least something is working properly.
With that AI scandal and all of the botched updates I’m sure they either have no QC or they simply don’t care about it.
4 Likes
its really nice because A3 doesnt detonate ammo that it hits for some reason
or at least a lot of the time it doesnt
so you can still use A2
the crazy part if after all this the most fun abrams for its br is now the M1A1, so at least 1 abrams is good
gaijin geniunely think the m1a2sepv3, 40years later has a 10mm hull improvement with 500kg lmfao
13 Likes
imagine t90m with the same hull armor as t72a💀
6 Likes
by the devs logic the 2a5 should have the same hull armor as the 2a4 since it only gained 4t or weight while having new turret armor.
6 Likes
I mean unless theirs some major weight change it SHOULD
Edit the hull on the T90M weighs 3 tonnes more than the T72A and thats with Spall liner New Engine and everything else Ie (Relikt weight too). The Sepv3 saves weight with new road wheels new electric drive system and a few other things. Gajin kinda shot themselves in the foot here
9 Likes
This is a Strawman, Panther.
You and I both agree that such a claim/assumption is incorrect, but don’t claim arguments are others without first confirming with them, cause I never made such an argument.
My argument is about filling the existing space in the “cavity”. Just adding DU [which Gaijin currently has modeled as] would improve by 15 - 25%, which it improves it by 17.1% in-game currently.
Adding DU, and filling the portion behind the array with more array could bring a hypothetical 520mm of protection, which is about 36% improvement.
Without proof of that portion being filled with more array, we can’t know.
5 Likes
There’s pictures of Ukrainian abrams having the array completely fill that space.
7 Likes
They’ve yet to be posted among my presence.
I mean, they have a back to the array in every document - that one has a pretty big gap between its back array.
Could bring that closer and then seal it with a back plate of just steel in the mean time.
But also, going back to the 2021 article where they said they would use some reasonable estimation.
We wont produce classified docs to support russia, and they keep moving the goal post to try and frustrate people into break a policy.
Just my opinion, and while I personally didnt take part in the data collection or the initial report, I do think its reasonable to expect them to do something along the lines of what they stated they would in 2021… guestimate.
1 Like