That video is using the SEPv1 with TUSK, so thanks for proving my point.
I doubt he’s even reading your comments.
How many times have I died in the Abrams because I couldn’t aim at a weak spot on a Soviet MBT in time. While you’re trying to line up a shot at the lower glacis or the turret ring, the BVM player just shoots you in third-person view, and you die — or he disables your gun drives, engine, kills your gunner and commander, and you just sit there like a frozen brick waiting for your fate.
I measured it specifically, there is practically no difference.
Personally speaking I sit just above a 2.0 KD in the CR2BN (which I have like 1800 matches or so in iirc) and I expect the abrams to actually be lower than that, not because it’s worse but because the extra mobility encourages me to make dumber decisions.
I doubt you even know what you’re talking about.
Says the dude that can’t even make tests properly.
Same one that can’t figure out the construction angle of different plates.
Same one that was spreading fake news how 90M Arena is getting Relikt on the LFP.
You’re either maliciously ignorant or something else I can’t say. Your pick.
bushy t-80ue is just as common as clickbait, they are one of the best feeder foods for top tier bro
How much slower is the M1A2 SEP V2 with TUSK/ARAT compared to an Abrams without ERA?
I went even further. I took the heaviest Abrams M1A2 SEP V2 with TUSK/ARAT ERA and compared it without it. And guess what? There’s no difference.
Ahahha
Bingo!
Abrams clearly having improved protection - incredibly low balled estimates and forensic investigation.
Primary source British document showing l27a1 can penetrate a t-80u frontally at combat ranges - something nebulous about not being clear enough and hilariously (and very sadly) using the in game protection analysis when denying the report. Just so we’re clear - they’re denying primary source documents because they don’t believe it.
Russia doesn’t have a IR guided missile? Just make it the hell up, doesn’t matter. The seeker in the marketing brochure is absolute trash? Doesn’t matter, just make it so far beyond the brochure claims that Pravda would be embarrassed to report such a thing.
The hypocrisy and double standards are plain, it’s not wonder people don’t trust them.
More fairy tails? More excuses? Or we actually gonna check people’s observation?
That’s what I got
Well, I’m not surprised at all. My observations correlate with other people’s opinion and not a word about China. So stop spreading misinformation
Checked how much have you played top tier recently
Big mouth for someone who even wasn’t playing like from march
Which comes full circle to this part:
If you know some basics of the game, some common sense and even a little bit of situational awareness you can turn the Abrams into an incredible brawler.
When playing the Abrams, you have no margin for error.
You actually have a decent margin of error if you just think about what I listed in my previous reply.
I do some stupid shit in my Abrams and I can get away with it by just using my brain.
I want what you’re on
However, the Abrams is the slowest tank no matter where you try to rush, a T-80BVM will be waiting for you there.
How is your Abrams this slow? What is your crew level? Is your crew experted or aced?
Mine are not anywhere near that slow.
Still not even close when the Merkavas, Challys, non AMV Arietes, T-90M, T-72B3 etc exist.
How on earth can you have so many skill issues?
Complaining about the Abrams’ mobility is already a whole new level of madness


