Redesign the navy's targeting system to be different from WT Mobile

Suggestions Gameplay
,
135

And others just adapt and play. Deferred for 2+ month naval marathon hit way more on naval modes, do you protesting against it, looks like - no.

136

I’m sorry. I don’t understand this comment. I think you might be saying that this horrific change was buried in a suggestions forum for 2 months… and you’re stating that the active player base pouring hundreds of dollars into Naval ships weren’t nerds enough to live on the forums so… it’s their fault? For not catching this catastrophe before it launched?

How about Gaijin, before making such a dramatic change, make the test play more public? Post this massive game mechanic change on the news section of the main website and invite active Naval Players to weight in on it BEFORE the change?

That sounds like the smarter thing to do. Like they did with the roadmap.

3 Likes
137

Do you protested that roadmap had no good changes for naval? I don’t think so, i suppose you’ve been content playing you favorite boat.

139

I know some are very enthusiastic about this thread and topic but please don’t spam, constructive criticism is welcome.

Constructive criticism: Constructive criticism is a type of feedback that offers specific and actionable advice to improve . It should be clear and direct and include the practical steps that can be taken moving forward.

Spam: Spam is basically posting something that doesn’t contribute anything insightful , a complete duplicate of an existing post and just general irrelevance.

2 Likes
140

There is only one real truth here, that only developers could tell how new aiming influenced the NAB playerbase and its enjoyment, if they content with impact it stays.

2 Likes
141

Correct!
Both International and Ru Forum threads and numbers suggest people didn’t and don’t want it*,
So hopefully the Devs make good choices.

*Russian Forum suggestion poll results for the current system we have now:
image
64% of 161 people voted against simplified auto aiming system

International Forum current suggestion poll results against the system we have now:
image
So far 85% of 95 voters want to see the current simplified auto aim system reverted/changed

5 Likes
142

I can’t believe that, even though the MAJORITY of players hate this, that they’re rolling with it. What a nightmare.

If it wasn’t such an absolute nerf to player agency and any sort of skill based play, I’d be ok but…

It’s exactly that.

A complete mechanic shift that divorces you of any need for skill.

2 Likes
143

What a first world problem to be calling a "nightmare"😭

Only skill based issues I see are that a bunch of people do not use it … I suspect in case they get found out!

1 Like
144

lol. My guy. This is a video game forum. What are you on about? Every comment here is a first world problem. Yours. Mine. Kweeds. What is your point?

We’re here to talk about how current Naval Arcade Aim system diminishes the gameplay and enjoyment.

We’re here to show a consolidated stance that this is not acceptable for the majority of us. We do this by pointing out the mechanics we find are problematic, explain why we want them changed, and we even take polls.

Why are you here if not to discuss “first world problems?” I don’t get it.

Regardless, I’'m thankful for your contributions to keep this forum post alive and active.

3 Likes
145

Calling it a “nightmare” is histrionic then - is that better?

So sorry you can’t cope with this change - plenty of us do.

146

It’s okay the majority of us would rather not play WT period,
We are not forcing anyone to stay and play the broken “game” that is current.
Especially the brown nose club.

Edit: I have closed the poll (not the thread, people can still comment) as the numbers are clear as day.
I am also uninstalling WT until they sort out Navy Arcade Aiming System,
So I apologize - because of this I will not be able to reply or further contribute to the conversation. Good-luck.

2 Likes
147

it’s cool. I was upset but it’s seriously going to save me some money. Been a long time I wasn’t tied to WT everyday with a log in and a few games. It’s nice to not worry about it. Oblivion Remastered, let’s goooooo.

1 Like
148

Edgy

Weak move, you didn’t wait till statshark statistics published just one day.

149

Player count 6.2% increase

February-March March-April
BR USA Germany USSR Britain Japan Italy France BR USA Germany USSR Britain Japan Italy France
1.0 33 46 45 20 21 11 11 1.0 74 96 86 46 59 25 43
1.3 92 186 159 54 55 37 55 1.3 91 177 174 67 92 52 104
1.7 3917 4569 5015 1573 1636 1089 119 1.7 3579 3918 4586 1606 18 1092 1866
2.0 1092 11417 13853 4566 411 3229 2738 2.0 11684 12221 14938 5535 5528 3643 4583
2.3 4932 4062 489 1739 1465 791 883 2.3 4577 3324 4623 1591 2581 857 1456
2.7 573 3598 3964 1764 1465 646 777 2.7 5625 3451 4389 1836 2815 665 141
3.0 2631 1778 2295 1306 577 280 547 3.0 2759 1967 2851 1468 1827 362 1149
3.3 15297 471 8973 2701 5089 2004 752 3.3 16136 4502 9487 2627 6585 2399 1567
3.7 7584 6079 4868 2167 2493 1118 1254 3.7 7251 6216 4764 2607 3028 1326 1979
4.0 24088 10772 14531 4816 7849 3283 2306 4.0 24216 10682 14137 5897 8756 3834 3096
4.3 28369 25245 23173 10466 11102 4974 4648 4.3 31474 25836 23713 13431 13436 6266 584
4.7 11241 21755 11746 8768 6018 2228 4489 4.7 12414 2247 12202 11545 7287 2858 5698
5.0 15664 14617 16388 5151 7734 2016 2846 5.0 1726 13784 14639 681 8356 2508 3802
5.3 13866 11715 15272 4088 7299 1756 3039 5.3 15287 1154 13763 5501 7528 2278 3981
5.7 22354 10622 17416 4279 9321 1517 3244 5.7 24145 10515 14223 4867 8631 1859 3978
6.0 8466 2886 8752 1373 2376 350 498 6.0 8538 2993 6308 1723 2113 465 818
6.3 4302 3467 4422 1271 1456 354 463 6.3 6126 4542 6371 193 2049 597 884
6.7 431 2646 2554 1049 1953 250 329 6.7 7214 4148 5155 1778 2998 465 1596
7.0 7369 3428 4081 1471 4003 375 483 7.0 9891 4342 5101 2042 4681 505 2103
7.3 3051 2262 2171 1041 2344 211 294 7.3 4413 2856 282 1515 2976 290 1451
175352 141621 160167 59663 74667 26519 29775 667764 197220 118971 161792 66556 91344 32346 40879 709108

Checkmate haters

image
image1920×1080 155 KB

Colorized

Games played 21.3% increase

February-March March-April
BR USA Germany USSR Britain Japan Italy France BR USA Germany USSR Britain Japan Italy France
1.0 40 47 47 20 26 11 12 1.0 80 116 105 57 70 27 49
1.3 98 205 170 57 68 46 60 1.3 96 206 185 70 102 57 114
1.7 5604 7425 7523 2252 2859 1626 2204 1.7 496 5879 6642 2295 3156 1599 3216
2.0 24877 30559 37622 10599 10863 7345 11795 2.0 25127 30803 4036 12909 16792 8713 20783
2.3 12844 10433 12753 465 4326 2105 2558 2.3 10905 7563 11541 4757 7025 2087 4134
2.7 17612 10166 14291 5796 4467 1684 3443 2.7 16025 9839 15897 6564 9067 2016 6163
3.0 5461 3507 5848 3021 1085 589 1368 3.0 6572 4365 8183 4643 4606 909 3553
3.3 37556 24107 26963 13371 11904 4762 4377 3.3 4172 28558 3147 18029 19867 5887 1301
3.7 13099 11971 9136 3587 4369 1609 2865 3.7 14042 14971 10422 5253 5839 2074 6567
4.0 51512 20408 29835 9124 20477 6183 6364 4.0 52896 21818 29054 1208 21836 7372 11613
4.3 64974 54551 58639 23759 347 12472 12582 4.3 73654 59035 66487 32971 41782 16456 19124
4.7 27053 42729 30036 18622 13944 5982 9709 4.7 32345 46156 34831 27397 19299 8307 13827
5.0 40204 40151 47354 16744 22066 6256 8658 5.0 49096 39494 49686 23597 25924 8742 12863
5.3 40368 37451 48163 13642 2084 6207 9533 5.3 53233 41402 57069 2047 24297 8653 18474
5.7 125197 62657 83683 26006 40723 8427 14384 5.7 153728 64523 70847 33328 43545 1126 26403
6.0 20843 8343 20921 3815 5511 1089 1381 6.0 22224 7911 1464 4446 4814 1204 2339
6.3 12082 12365 12632 429 4468 1186 1351 6.3 23584 21569 24272 8771 7516 2413 3788
6.7 12728 7886 7032 3481 5637 663 982 6.7 33254 21043 22419 9515 13366 1726 5723
7.0 53046 33197 36637 10803 29605 2851 3054 7.0 87414 47967 53869 17784 45535 3928 11891
7.3 13663 11458 13599 4407 10855 908 978 7.3 24861 17752 20144 7877 20119 131 4616
578861 429616 502884 170000 195684 72001 97658 2046704 683804 490970 490300 223518 334557 83427 176541 2483117

image
image1920×1080 166 KB

150

Btw look how your community reacts on naval suggestions

49 votes on month long tread 408 views like no one cares

image
image1920×1080 337 KB

And here is ours just look at the number of treads views and posts

image
image1920×1080 524 KB

Most of them is game mechanics, not just another ship model pleading

151

Even if you’ve stopped playing, I really wish you hadn’t closed the poll. I don’t think it’s fair to end it with only around 100 votes, as that’s a relatively small sample size. There are still plenty of players who actively play NAB and would like to cast their votes whether in support or against. Besides, many bugs and changes related to NAB have been addressed recently. Some players who initially voted ‘yes’ might even want to change their vote to ‘no’ now that their gameplay experience has improved. I’m still interested in seeing how opinions evolve, as they could change in the coming months.

Closing the poll might give the wrong impression that the proposal has been abandoned or that no further discussion is encouraged. I believe many of us still want to have a say in the current state of the targeting system. Even if the proposal doesn’t result in a full reversion, it could still bring about positive adjustments that we can all agree on as common ground. It’s something we should bring forward.

1 Like
152

100% agree, there was no reason for the poll to close.

Are you sure about the data?
Something is not adding up, for example Germany 5,7

February - March

image
image1467×1181 391 KB

March - April

image
image1646×1132 473 KB

There is 6.2% ioncreace in General data but on per ships the battles are about 2/3 less.

153

Vehicle data still not there, if you not remember RB and ground show the same bias in vehicles

154

The games played vs the SUM of battles per ship do not match for either periods, that is why I post them like this.

is there a possibilty that in “games played” it counts the bots?

**they have also increaced them before the patch

1 Like
155

In one match is not one player playing so probably almost every match got at least 1 Scharnhorst, and this it games by BR so vehicle could have been in battle in ±1 BR and between