Now that the thing you blindly call unrealistic is proven to be realistic, you turn your argument; you reveal you weren’t even asking for realism in the first place, only the dominance of the tanks you play.
Brother, for the love of god, I get it, you like your little Chinese tonks and I will not talk about them again.
I do not care to further discuss with you after your initial hostility.
Especially funny is how you turn hostile and accuse me of the hostility you yourself initially came with. Isn’t this the most perfect forum conversation? We’re reaching new heights. Semi-unironically, even.
Yea i also don’t understand why Russian mains are constantly baching on the Strv122 despite it Being nerfed Multiple times(Composite calculation)
And tanks around it have gotten significantly better
And the br spread is also much larger so the strv122 is no longer seeing early mbts
The thing about the strv122 that even caused me to just j out on the Sight of a pair of strv122 is the fact they are most often played by very Very skilled Players
Meanwhile Germany Russia and the us are Starter nations and the fact premium and squadron vehicle’s exists means they they have a fair share of completely clueless players
unlike Sweden which only seams to attract Sweden mains(national pride or like for Strange vehicle’s) and people aiming for top tier because Sweden has very little meta lineups (they have 0 tech Tree heavy tanks)and don’t get me started on the air Tree
Edit: Removed any slightly offensive language after removal. Don’t mind the re-post.
One of the 10 Gaijillion “Russian Bias!!” threads on the EN forum.
Those protrusions from the engine deck are made of flexible rubber, just so you know. It looks impossible because Gaijin hasn’t modeled the rubber bending.
Actually, if you were half-interested in Chinese tanks, you would know that Gaijin initially made it a restriction on the depression. It was quickly bug reported, but took MONTHS for them to fix a simple issue.
Then some clueless person comes in and says Gaijin is anti-NATO. People who believe in “Russian bias” are not correct, but those who believe in “Chinese bias” are completely disconnected from reality.
Where were you when they added autoloader modules to the game few patches ago. How does that benefit the French, Japanese, Russian and Chinese MBTs? It does not, it is a net negative to the performance of the MBT when your autoloader gets knocked out with almost every single hit you take and requires 25s+ to repair. The change was a NET gain to all the non autoloaded MBTs, such as the Abrams & Leopards - a crew change is faster than repairing a broken autoloader. But I didn’t hear you complain about that addition, why?
And all manual loaded tanks got buffs to 5 second reload rates relatively recently, which are all mostly NATO tanks aka non Russian tanks. So please, spare us with when realism is super convenient only for the Russians.