Reactive Armor vs DM53 Apfsds rounds -Realism issue

I’m sorry? 0 hull armour? Mid reload rate? Are you joking or just wrong?

so its practically sekret document leak?

Damn, my bad.

how ignorant are you
go in protection analysis chally 3 TD put in m900 from m1128 and see how much can you pen

day 0 without sekret info leak again

Me finding pictures that are freely available online getting cooked by wt mods smh

F-14D manual ahhh situation

Elaborate

someone leak le F-14D manual
and its everywhere on google

Oh no the highest penetration 105mm dart isn’t useless against your tank
Now look at any other tank and see if they can be penned too lol

image
im out ur too ignorant

Byeeee

russian era like the k1, k5 and the “heavy” relict doesnt have statics values, the protection does depends on the angle, they proably offers too much protection against ke at 90º but the values are not static

They do not. I did my research and asked a friend much more experienced in this field.

Isn’t that Brits developed that round after they got their hand on T-80UK in 1992? with K-5 too

1 Like

It doesnt have a tip that shears off the round was designed to defeat Soviet/Russian K5 ERA and in testing it did so.

In game it does not

Please, provide evidence.

Very hard to find now, I have it on good authority that L27A1 does have an ERA tip here is a picture of some rounds. Being DU it is self sharpening.

image

It shouldn’t matter since gaijin is so concerned with realistic armor values, a DM53 round would punch through a T series anywhere irl, their ERA is artificially buffed.

That is not evidence.