It’s getting ridiculous. The Rafale radar gets buffed every time, but the CAPTOR is still modeled like a 60s mechanical radar. How can they gather information about a highly classified AESA radar but not a mechanical radar? It’s not even balanced. The ghosting on the CAPTOR is worse than the Viggen’s radar.And I just thought about the MiG-29SMT radar, the Zhuk-ME. The funny thing is that both the Zhuk-ME and the CAPTOR-M of the Eurofighters in the game right now are the most advanced/newest mechanical radars in the game. Both are still widely in use and highly classified. So Gaijin needs to “guess” the performance of these radars. And for some reason, they think the Eurofighter’s radar is a complete copy of the Blue Vixen. Sure, it’s based on it, but it doesn’t even come close to having the same performance. It has a 330-degree search speed, which is an AESA-class scan speed, and its chaff resistance is amazing. But in-game, it feels like a Viggen radar with data link.The SMT is a whole different story. The radar is extremely good, responsive, and has excellent chaff resistance. The Eurofighter is at 14.0, so it wouldn’t be overpowered to add it either way. It’s always like this: NATO vehicles are always nerfed when they guess, while Russian/Chinese vehicles are always great when they guess. I don’t believe in the bias thing, but it’s getting pretty obvious that they have some favorites.
1 Like
Because there are informations about rafale’s radar, it is as simple as that
And no France is by far not the favorite nation of gaijin, there still are problems with the rafale’s radar that it shares with the eurofighter like the buggy tws at times.
4 Likes
Its not even close to be as shit as the EF doe. its fr just a blue vixen with 6 datalinks. And it should not be like that. And the Rafale radar should also be miles better than it is