That’s exactly what we’re saying about the 18F lmaooo but this guy is SO MAD for some reason.
Core thing to point here: YES, the 18F would add little to no value in the US tech tree, copy paste, filler, whatever. BUT IT’S JUST COOL.
The exact same can be said about a BUNCH of other vehicles, they would serve little to no purpose but they’re just cool and would be nice to have.
If I remember correctly that’s basically Gaijin’s official take on strategic bombers… On BVVD’s Q&A when asked about strategic bombers he said they might appear in the game as “museum pieces, collector’s aircraft or event vehicles (which often are bums), they could be interesting for players”
That’s the entire point, it might not be the most functional thing ever, BUT IT’S JUST COOL AND PEOPLE WANT IT, but again, there’s a certain someone here fuming about that idea.
I’m honestly surprised we don’t see more of the whole content copy paste stuff, but they’re probably waiting for things to die down with top tier so they can add a 1 to 1 copy of something into a TT from another TT/Prem area.
no ? i am aginst all double seated plane if they dont have a advantage over the single seat like better case selection of automatics selection by copilot.
if a vehicle fits into a tech tree with good reason (built and/or operated by the country or its subtrees) then it should go there.
Its natural for some trees to be bigger, how can new countries like israel ever compare to the might that is the USA or British Empire in arsenals of history? As long as all nations are competitive it doesnt matter much
Marder A1 is 7.7 and Marder A3 is 8.0. BMP-2 is 8.7.
mKPZ M47 G is 7.3. T-55AM is 9.0.
Both Wiesel 1A4 and ZSU-23-4M2 are 7.3, but the ZSU-23-4M2 was specifically built as a stopgap solution while the BMP-2 was being developed during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, therefore, it would be impossible for Germany to receive it.
Also are you seriously trying it use the Wiesel as an SPAA? :sob:
