Nice try but I asked for 5, you gave me 3. But let’s work with that!
What would the Rafale add to the Japanese tech tree when it already has TWO air sub trees and very decent critters both for A/A and A/G such as the 18D and Su-30, MAYBE even the Gripen…? Up to you.
What would R-73s add to the Russian tech tree when the Su-27 is right there, when the Su-34 is right there. Even so, you’re talking about the specific weaponry a plane carries, not a variant of it lol.
And sorry but Germany literally doesn’t operate that EFT. It’s like saying “Japan should the the F-15E” when Japan has F-15s just not the E variant lmao.
Ok dude, once again. It’s NOT that we don’t understand what he said or that we think it’s coming. We’re just pointing out inconsistecies throughout the game and our desire to have the twin seat variants added, how many times do we have to repeat ourselves.
It’s ok it might never get added, but we have the pass in this forum to discuss why and/or how it should be added, our desire for it in the US tree so on and so on, if you disagree with that… I’m sorry man, close this forum and leave us be lmfaoo, we won’t stop saying we wished the US got the twin seat hornets.
Yeah won’t go over points because samuri is giving the same answers I’d give and I want to say the US is prob getting more advanced F-16 blocks in the near future so there’s that
germany kept soviet stuff after the fall like the is2 / bmp2 / t55A / t55amv / t34. but some of them are copy slop so just few can come to replace weaker in the aleardy german tree.
bmp2 can replace marder with its weak gun.
the t55amv can replace the m48
the zsu23-4 can without at 7.0 can replace the weak wiesel spaa.
Yeah yall are starting to get it lmao, but I guess I can use the very same argument people are repeating here: what would any of these actually bring to the USSR tech tree?
That’s right, nothing. Who cares about the 23BN, another Su-17? Another MiG-17 but now with afterburner? Weaponry are a problem of their own, MiG-29SM when the SMT exists?
Don’t get me wrong tho, YES, I would like to see a lot of those in-game. Just pointing out the shallow arguments being used here.
Personally I was just ragebaiting because that argument is dumb asf imo, personally I wouldn’t mind them being tossed in as folder filler slop but yk yk
Also don’t down play MiG-17PF like that, they mog.
what happened to this claim? Germany is already one of the largest, and definitely one of the strongest ground trees in the game as it stands. Why should we keep funneling more vehicles into it, especially when said vehicles can ALL be found inside the USSR tree?
