230 at least
And theres provided comparsion, in which Harpoon got 1.5+ times better range.
And lol, that still not 240 km/etc, that you stated.
1 Like
The author does not know at what range it is capable of hitting targets. The manufacturer did not declare the range of damage
And you cant read, ok?
He literally stated that it have unclassified range is 230, while launching from VESSEL.
And re created situation with Harpoon.
What is it?
Not only manufacturer can state range
240 km is an adequate range for a missile of this size.
2 Likes
250+ miles also, what a problem?
1 Like
250 miles is 462 km. To do this, you need a bigger rocket and for the accelerator to work not for 5 seconds, but for all 15
Thats already longer than R-37 1.5 times, for example
Sm-6 is big enough.
1 Like
250 nm only Sea Targets
but less than 40N6
And nowhere stated that is 250 nmi only on (navy? What?) targets
And? what is this for?
SM-6 can be used to strike vessels.
If SM-6 can strike a sea target at 250 nm, that means its flight path range is 250 nm, meaning the range it can engage a hot target at is certainly greater than this.
As additional target yes.
But that no way describes anything about attack of plane/etc
Alao, discussion started from AIM-174, which can have way better launch speed and altitude
Shooting at sea targets is not equal to the range of air targets
Learn physics
1 Like
Yes, target will approach you)
So, will give even better range from starting point)
1 Like
At the same time, there are large gravitational losses, as well as losses from inductive resistance. And the range will be reduced by 2 times