R-77s are horrid and the R-77-1 is needed

Who knows?
That same as excact band - nobody know.

SM-6 deployed on F-18s, with DL guidance from forward positioned F-35Cs will be a complete menace to any airborne target, especially AWACS or bomber formations.

250nm range ahhh missile

240 Km, not 250nm

Depends on version.
Theres not enough info about SM-6 version, on which AIM-174B based
So can be 250 miles also.

Such long ranges are for ground strike use when SM-6 used as erzatz ballistic missile.

Maybe, but that still range, where it can hit

image

That’s for A
What about B?

Also

“It doesn’t replace the SM-2,” which will stay in service alongside the SM-6, he emphasized, but “it gives you increased firepower, it gives you extended range.”

What am I supposed to see here?

“It gives you extended range” over sm-2(on which your table is based)

240km

SmartSelect_20240714_134505_Chrome
Well…
At same time wikipedia states 250 nmi

wikipedia-It’s such a reliable source))

2 Likes

You literally posted wikipedia.

We are waiting for official information

duality of a man lmao

No, i just stated that some sites cant even copy a wikipedia

Or maybe it just from different date.

I meant his response sorry for misunderstanding.

3 Likes

oh no buddy, its at or better than 250 Nautical Miles

BBCRF really fighting his own endseig against the inexorable loss of Russian systems having any parity to real military powers.

5 Likes

Read again what you sent yourself.
The author himself does not know at what range the missile hits targets. She can fly away for 1000km as a dummy.

1 Like