So people strictly into realism won’t use mouse aim in the first place. And your second key expression was “the realistic experience for a tank crew”.
Imho it makes no sense to deny the fact that Ground RB allows fantasy game play of planes vs tanks - and therefore there can’t be a realistic experience for both of them just based on the set-up of wt. And we haven’t even talked about the irl difficulties to spot a tank in the first place.
My examples were aimed to set your claim in the right context. WT and realistic experiences are 2 different things. And i don’t want to get dragged into another realism/accuracy/realistic debate. WT is a video game and far away from reality.
right, i said basically the only argument to all of the proposed changes is the ground option… like 3 times so far.
Plus your argument is further invalid by it being irrelevant. They would have Both. Mixed battles (like they currently have) and then a Ground forces only mode… So you, and any others like you, can still have mixed battles… and then those that want Ground ONLY option, can have that as well.
sure, i get that… But really i think i would be hard pressed to find people who wouldnt PREFER all of these changes (Again, the only exception being the ground forces option, and even then i bet i could get a significant people interested.)
yup, ive known this for a While… planes simply do Way too much damage in game. They should be blowing tracks up, and that is about it, same with their other armaments
first of all is Lose, not loose (loose is the opposite of tight, where lose is the opposite of win)
But yes, i completely agree with you, or… i suppose rather, you agree with me. Both crew xp and research points obtained are both Pathetically, Annoyingly, Disgustingly low.
To put it into context, i am at over 5,000 hours played and for crew xp , my highest is i think level 46, out of 150… Which… is again, Pathetic and Unacceptable
And then my Research of vehicles (i play 99% ground forces), and i play ALL nations, i am at about 9.0 in average, for ALL nations… which… even at 2,000 hours would be pretty sad/bad/pathetic/ridiculous… but at 5,000? FIVE THOUSAND hours, and im still at 9.0? Asinine.
Because wagers and orders are task-based rewards, not flatout multipliers for everything used in battle.
All of them? The only one I agree with is the sniping-spot point, and even then there are entire maps based on these spots…
It’s just a cope-post mate, why would anybody agree with anything in it.
Your approach is going to quickly lose you friends and gain you no support…
I’m definitely in agreement with most of your ideas; however, you need to convince others of that. Letting these discussions feel like each counter argument to your idea is a personal attack won’t get you far.
I checked your thunder score and you definitely have a lot of experience in this game. More than most, and a more effective rating at 5k hours. That’s better than many here, so I’m sure you do have some insight. Just make sure to share the insight and don’t bludgeon people. Otherwise this forum will turn against you in a heartbeat.
Listen and engage everyone - you obviously have a topic a few people are already interested in or you wouldn’t have this level of engagement.
At this point this has mostly stopped being a discussion (read: exchange of differing ideas) thead or a suggestion thread, and seems more like a rant thread.
But im not going to sugar coat … most things, or change who i am, or how i talk, for the most part.
So, those that can handle the bluntness/directness and honesty/accuracy, Great (and some even prefer it, which i know is a small percentage)
If not, oh well. Again, im not going to change. I will be respectful and polite, for the most part, as i am, but when challenged or when someone says something stupid, i am going to react as such.
Second of all. So you would Prefer the crew train cost to charge/cost you, every time you put a vehicle in a crew slow?
You Prefer smaller maps? and prefer them red zoning medium/small maps, and making them even smaller?
You Prefer them removing sniping spots, instead of them providing sufficient cover to spawns, and areas on the map?
You PREFER crew xp taking 40 years to get to max level (i.e. them giving ridiculously low amounts of crew xp to players)
You Prefer it also taking 50,000 hours to grind out every vehicle in the game?
you are also wrong about the boosters… You said MOST boosters do not expire… and 90% of what most people get/have are Award boosters
Others like me? ou don’t even kniw my Position onnRB TO. I mak for RB TO. I criticized your claim not you position. Learn to differentiate.
Where did i state that i am against RB TO? Where?
I said that CAS abusers are NOT(!!) the only ones against that suggestion. That’s it. That doesn’t mean that i am against the suggestion, it just means your statement is wrong.
Especially since i called those people that also are against it delusional a post later…