Pz4H should be at 4.3 to 4.7

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
36

The fact is, you’re a typical German player, only defending the nation you like.

Let me guess—most of your Leopard 1 matches were played during the 7.3 BR era, weren’t they? Don’t tell me you’ve forgotten that the Leopard 1 was once at 7.3.

The Leopard 1 was at 7.3, while the M60 and AMX-30 were at 7.7. Why?
This is the best evidence: it’s the result of German players’ poor skills.

I have to thank Gaijin’s big data balancing method again—maybe one day we’ll see the King Tiger at 1.0 BR.

I don’t want to sound so harsh, but this is the reality: you’re just a group of beneficiaries who don’t want the vehicles of the nation you like to return to a BR on par with others.

I will never forget how German players complained when the Leopard 1 at 7.3 was moved to the same BR as other NATO 105mm MBTs.
Even now, I occasionally hear complaints about how unfair it is for the Leopard 1 to sit at 8.0.

The Panzer IV should have been restored to its proper tier long ago.

And about your claim of not having light tanks? Puma? German M41? RU 251?
The fact is, most German players would rather stick to their big cats than play light tanks. The game provides you with options, but you choose not to use them. Whose fault is that?
By the way, the Soviet tech tree doesn’t get a truly usable light tank until the BTR at 7.3. Before that, most of their spotting tanks are painfully slow.

As for the complaint about Germany not being paired with U.S. teammates—that’s even funnier. I didn’t know that Japanese, British, Italian, French, Swedish, and Chinese players were all much more likely to get U.S. teammates while only German players had to suffer from U.S. planes wreaking havoc.

I can show you the win rate chart again.
Every other nation faces the U.S. as their enemy,
but only Germany has ridiculously low win rates.
This once again proves that it’s a player skill issue

4 Likes
37

I don’t remember Panzer IV H being at 4.7, only 4.3. I wouldn’t mind it being even at 4.7.

Chi to’s gun is better, thus it was 0.4 higher than Panzer IV H at 4.3.

It’s not about German players, it’s about major vs minor nations.

Russian T-34s have been moved down for no reason as well.

It didn’t happen to Shermans because of stabilizers and reload time. They fit very well into War Thunder’s meta and cqc maps.

2 Likes
38

I dont think any WW2 tank needs to move anywhere.Let the game settle at least in one area.Focus on the mess that is top tier.

They shifted all the 5.7s to 6BR and ruined the game, enough is enough.

39

It’s a rank 2 vehicle.

Coincidentally, it progresses zero events or battlepass tasks. It also gains a penalty of significant proportions researching rank IV vehicles.

Until after you got every german vehicle you want, using the puma after getting your desired rank 3 vehicles is literally griefing yourself in progression.

I say this as someone who plays rus/ger/brit vehicles with relative equality on the ground.

5 Likes
40

ok

42

Huh? M18 6.0br, T92 7.0br, M41 6.1br, what is their relations with Pz4H needed to rise it br?

43

Nothing. They are fighting over German players bad stereotype.

1 Like
44

And what do you expect after Gaijin pulverized Germany between 6.3 to 8.0 in the last BR changes, the stupid long ranges and sniping nerfs in ALL maps specially bad for germany tanks and move up tanks keeping nerfs like Panthers, Leopards and so on???
Here you have Germany win ratios one year ago before Gaijin decided the incompetent allies players need more and more hand outs.
Screenshot - 2024-11-19T150854.129

45

Fighting is a strong word. More like explaining.

46

USA have bad win ratios: bad lienups, nerfs, see more powerfull enemies.
Soviets have bad win ratios : bad lienups, nerfs, see more powerfull enemies.
Germany have bad win ratios : bad players.

5 Likes
47

This thread discusses German tank’s BR. It’s doomed to devolve into “German players bad” gossip.

It already did in mere 9 replies, even though no one actually defends Panzer IV H being at 3.7, most say it should be 4.0.

2 Likes
48

Content creators fishing for easy likes be like:

These content creators channel their audience’s inner frustration with the game, creating a scape goat - le Germany bad. A scape goat other players can make fun of, because it has been sanctified by these Youtubers. This opinion then gets regurgitated on sites like Plebbit, which is basically just a hub of USA players.

I see players behaving like lemmings on all sides, not just Germany. That’s why “germany le bad” stance is just so ridiculous to me and oftentimes I just have to speak out against it, which then devolves into what you saw above.

Yeah, I think we all agree Pz IV should be 4.0 no problem, just place them back at rank III where they belong.

6 Likes
49

“Panter2005”
“Flak_Dancer”
Even without checking your stats, just looking at your IDs, I can tell which nation you mainly play. I looked it up, and sure enough, you’re a German main.

You German mains coming out to defend Germany is the biggest irony.

3 Likes
50

I hate the whole Panzer IV lineup. These tanks are too weak, even AA trucks lol kill it, as well as every plane with cal50… US fighters and others don’t even have to spawn with bombs, they just cal50 it. Mobility is not so good and the box armor is unforgivingly bad. Gun traverse is meh as well. The first versions can be even cal50ties through the sides. The pen doesn’t really matter that much, if everything else is as it is. US just spawn their fighters machine gun them. Russians and other spawn fast AA vehicles to lol bambambam it with 80mm pen autoguns.

The worst downside is actually the rank II issue. Its a waste of time to play vehicles below rank III.

When I play this BR range, I spawn the KV-1B and Churchill 3 as well as the Recon Puma. Especially the KV1 is just one BR tick higher and has far better mobility and handling. Super armor which is hard to come by. You won’t suffer to autocannons and cal 50. The 88mm pen are totally enough to deal with almost all threats.

1 Like
53

Instead of making it personal or stat-shaming other people try to bring valuable points to the discussion.
Just remember that you’re supposed to respect each other and there are always ways to politely disagree.

3 Likes
55

What aa trucks you means? If the aa truck you refered to are Gaz-MM, Zis-12 or Sdkfz6/2=3 then I would say that is you problem. There is no medium tank this br range can stand a chance against medium caliber AA

56

100% for 4.3, the G also ought to be 3.7 and the Italian G at 4.0

57

Not matter the penetration skills only. The mobilty and armor also matter. PZ4H have weak front turrent armor(50mm). From this able to kill it with low BR tanks. Only experts able to use it most of them bleed when they enter close combat. More over sensitvy to Gun barrel, easy to knock out turrent crew and detonate his ammo with one shot.

Vehicle Knowledge need and you will realise why it stand on 3.7 and 4.0 BR.

The only reason why pz4h stand on 3.7 and 4.0 because need something which able to cope M4 shermans and T-34/76-s.

Spoiler

image
image1518×746 132 KB

58

What? You slide around a corner in your truck (or also tracked AA vehicles) and start spraying. 50mm armor and the weak gunbarrel should be no issue for most of the AA trucks. The french one at 2.0 has over 70mm pen. When they notice they’re up vs. German teams they often spawn them and simply autogun any german tank from any direction except the captured KV-1 or Churchill. They don’t even need to flank, they just cruise through the levels and use SPAA like super gunhandling.

1 Like
59

You can’t just point the 50mm part without adding those additional 20mm track a front of it. Furthermore Cromwell and Chi-Nu II also having the similar front turret armour and without those additional armour