T26E1 surviving in the background with the ling 90 aphe
Most shots of the 155mm HEAT that don’t pen usually over pressure.
It’s an all around better round for dealing with all vehicles types, unlike APHE which usually doesn’t fuse on light vehicles.
The HEAT is about 900m/s which isn’t low velocity.
Yes the Obj.279 has a higher top end, but the acceleration of the T58 is quite good, it’s reverse is a bit bad, but often that doesn’t matter because unless your gun is broken, your fine.
Obj.279 has a stronger hull, a stab, and better mobility.
T58 has a better turret, far better reload, a better round / selection of rounds, better turret traverse / elevation drive.
9.0 is the perfectly balanced br for the T58 as it is currently implemented, I will not argue with you, I bought it myself, it’s better than the 279, just admit it.
9.0 is a slight mercy to it to be honest, I haven’t even wanted to attempt playing 7.3 - 9.0 in any nation, in fact I’ve only been playing the T58 because it’s so broken.
If its reload was reduced to 5.0 secs, then and only then, it could stay 8.7.
But given how gaijin loves to keep broken USA tanks at lower brs for a very long time, it is likely the T58 will only move up after 3 months of it being in the game at best.
At least that is killable. I’ve bounced so many things I shouldn’t have in my T26E5, it’s also a great IS-3/4/6 killer, because you have double the reload, and can barrel, then track them, then kill them.
I literally kill 3 IS-3s that were playing smart vs my single T26E5 a couple weeks ago.
You talk like the E5 is so broken yet your KD is only 1.4 in the thing, And kills per game is barely higher than 1.
Clearly it is in fact killable.
Ignore Scorp. He’s just biased against America.
Just because I haven’t used it a lot, because I don’t particularly like it, doesn’t mean it’s not good lol.
Do I need to post your latest comments in other forum topics?
Talk about biased, your known around here for being the most biased, and least knowledgeable person.
You know he’s mad when he reports it
2 Likes
Huh, talking about yourself in second person was not something I expected.
Credit where credit is due, it’s more creative than talking about yourself in third person.
So per usual you have no counter argument.
You just come up with pointless comments. Nice! Our traditional Pangolin!
1 Like
Oof, the U.S. hater is mad.
Oh am I? Lmao okay, didn’t know you were 5 years old.
U.S. Hater or exposing the imbalance?
As you look at the list I set up before hand, a lot of nations got rebalancing. But clearly your biased eyes can’t see that.
2 Likes
“exposing imbalance” after calling mid U.S. vehicles OP lmao. You’re the living representation of a clickbait “(x) exposed” YouTube channel.
What’s really weird, is in my lovely list, is Germany got the most nerfs, and the least buffs, disproving your illegitimate argument once more.
But, had you actually read anything, unlike your super selective reading, you would’ve seen that.
;)
1 Like
Aww yes, the greatest nerf of all time, the SLM.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Where’d you pull that from?.
No LT in game is that thinly armoured.
By all standard of tank shell velocity it is fairly low velocity.
Again you using it doesn’t make it better nor worse than a statistically better vehicle.
The T58 moving to 8.7 would solve the majority of issues with it.
Has more effective turrer armour as well, you are massively over selling the effectiveness of the T58s armour.
The turret ring you mentioned as well cannot soak higher br darts.
The ammo isn’t exactly fantastic and you want it at a BR where composites are the regular.
You want this thing at the same BR as the ZTZ96, T72, Type 74G (which in my experience using it for the since update to get thr Oplot shrugs off the T58 HEAT and APHE.
2 Likes
Thanks for saying I’m apparently on drugs.
- I never said it should be 9.3, I said 9.0
- yes the T58 is more effective than the Turm III, which should be 8.7
Its not more effective than turm III I’m sorry to burst your bubble there.
Our opinions aren’t fact at all.
If the T58 was stabilised OR had an apds or AP like the m103 then it could potentially ve 9.0.
But the lack of stabiliser alone leaves it at an inherent disadvantage over any of the counterparts at it’s BR.
2 Likes
Don’t bother with him, he just hates U.S. vehicles.
Too much compression for T58 to be 9.0. It would get slaughtered. 8.7 and if they decompress then higher
Insanely terrible take. Turm 3 still holds a reload advantage over 99% of vehicles it faces while being exceptionally more useful in about a dozen more circumstances than the T58 due to its incredibly good mobility for any vehicle at the BR as well as its 30mm coax and good gun depression.
3 Likes