These are post trainee videos, watch the ones I have posted.
Read the posts before this too.
The “average” reload is above 6.0 secs. Ace crews shouldn’t be better than what I said previously.
In absolutely ideal conditions you may have a quicker reload. But in game, the tankers wear all but NBC gear. Nor is tank movement accounted for, in manual loaders, or fatigue.
The fastest data I saw for the T-80s was 5.5 seconds, 6.5 being the slowest. 6.0 is the actual and, the average, and what it is set to in production.
Therefore, it should be 6.0 secs.
They have no NATO nobility in reverse to get out of situations, and often cannot take a hit since weakpoints are easy hits in WT.
Then BR Placement would be considered for the faster firing tanks.
The cherry picking of what is and isn’t allowed, is annoying. Considering 90% of the nerfs are against Russia. It has turned me off of playing Russia anymore. I played USA and Italy all day. Yes I’d rather play Italy, and get the Leo-2a7V(HU) and have a good and fun time. Not a struggle to do anything.
It’s not M1 abrams with M774 and gen1 thermals and no armor bad… its not leo 2a4 with just dm23 bad, its not ariete bad… you are not considering even a TINY BIT what is actually at 10.7 when you suggest this change
But to say it needs to go up to 7.3, while the IS-3 heads down to 7.0 is having a laugh. Yeah, the mobility is improved, yes the gun is great. But you’re still a KT, you still have that 1-shot delete button that is your turret cheeks. IS-3 may need much longer to reload, but he won’t mind because his hit on you is going to lead to your demise if you don’t take out the IS3 first. As you can see from my winrate in it, the Germans are not having the greatest time when coming up against the USA/Soviets in the 7.0/7.3 area, as it is.
I’ll tell you one thing - you send KT 10.5 to 7.3 and you’ve essentially killed it off, because at that point, you’re better off just running the Maus with the 7.7 line-up.
let me clear, if you insist that you think the T-90A = the very first M1 I will from here on assume you are either trolling or have no idea what you’re talking about to the point I will disregard you as a default. That is how insane your current opinion is. Abort and reevaluate is my suggestion.
At the very least, comprehend that decompression is the way out of these balance issues rather than making the T-90A massively undertiered.
Fox at 8.0 is wild…Thats DF015.Marder territory. Not stabilised, no thermals no commander overide and it’s wheeled with an incredibly loud engine. If you die to the Fox it’s on you.
Conqueror has an 18 second reload with one of the worst performing rounds 120mm APDS sounds great but it’s 1st generation and it shatters or over penetrates a lot of the time.
So if its one shot to one shot capability, whom ever hits first, then that would be fair no? Tiger still has the quicker load. And better round, better mobility.
The only solution if you don’t agree, is:
Decompress everything 6.7 > 12.0, everything gets a 0.3 br increase. But the IS-3 is not any better than the KT105, nor is the IS6 much if any better, other than reload.
Not at all - KT 10.5 has a much higher chance of bouncing off an IS-3/IS-6 than the other way around. Not to mention, IS-3/IS-6 are much survivable to the numerous SPGs lobbing HE shells around that BR. I really don’t think there is a need to move any of these three vehicles, though.
Fake gaijin propaganda point they use so they don’t have to actually decompress, zero basis in reality.
As if that is not what should be strived for the most in a pvp game?
I have made literal entire spreadsheets dedicated to this as just an inspired user. The devs are capable of doing this overnight they just don’t want to.
