I just factor in the BR of the M163
I’ve had the spall liners save me from rear spall / the ATGMs being hit.
Also:
(Keep in mind this is thunderskill)
Tiger 10.5 stats:
Tiger II (H):
Tiger II(sla.16):
IS-3:
IS-6:
T29:
T26E5:
Per life, the USSR tanks have far lower efficiency.
The Tiger 105 is rather high.
The T29 is slightly behind the Tiger 105 but still quite good.
The T26E5 is good.
The normal Tiger II is on the lower side of good, but still good.
The Tiger II sla. Is better efficiency wise.
So what does this say? The lower br tanks are preforming better. The Russian heavies more and more encounter HEAT FS which they are extremely allergic to a single penetration
Yeah that’s true. Not sure why they made the m163 a 7.3… kinda nuts
The issue is not the IRST. The issue is that it has virtually no way to fight ground vehicles and no scanning radar.
The Gepard and Type 87 both have that in spades.
Now the ZSU is kinda shit. But it’s still better than the SIDAM.
The M163 is even worse, but still better than the SIDAM because you can actually kill vehicles with it.
1 Like
I form my opinions based on my own observation through years of playing as well as objective analysis of the vehicles. I do not care really how the community plays them, but I am aware of how gaijin balances vehicles.
I forgot about the type 87 too oops
SIDAM was kinda fixed in this regard when they added ammo crates. It has infinite APDS now as long as you are holding a defensive position.
I’m basing it off of effectiveness and stats, (or data) if you will.
Which makes a fair argument.
The ammo crates run out. Trust me. I know form experience
then you just build another, from experience you dont run out of apds if you just camp
You get more than one? I only ever get 1
it recharges for me pretty sure
If you go to a cap I think it does.
no, ive done it in spawn
im not a big fan of SPAA being much good at anti-tank beyond throwing tracks or obliterating light tanks unless it was built to also kill tanks to be honest. You get issues like what happened when the Falcon had full APDS belts
For how big and slow the Sidam is, it wouldn’t be all that bad
Any other br suggestions?
That’s wrong.
Hm okay.
I’m Kv-1 enjoyer, 4.7 is fine and Pe-8 is 4.7 too. By the way yeah, P-47D should move to 4.7 too
7.3 is ok. Why go down if you want KTH in 7.0/7.3 ? Is-3 was made to be superior and it’s fine at 7.3
Yeah sure, you’re complaiting about armor is more an issue, T-54 1947 is fine at 7.7. T-54 1949 could be back to 7.7, but 1951 is ok at 8.0
nope.
Conqueror 7.7, only frontal with additionnal armor modification, but you’ve 2 big weakspot in from : lower glassis and this :
Centurion mk10 : 8.0 is correct. You want to move this vehicule ? you need to move ALL of Centurion variants, excuse, ALL medium and MBT tanks in 8.0 - 9.0 area.
i’m gona stop here : you’re a russian main :
This is no sense. Yes, we’ve vehicles that need more adjustments in BR, more USSR vehicles by the way, and the main problem isn’t the vehicles: you’re the problem. Change your mine, reset the movement HOW TO PLAY, after 13,000 games accumulated, what you’re proposing is terrible and no sense.
Ps: do not flag comments if you don’t like reality.
5 Likes
IS-3 to 7.0? yeah, sure.
I mean, T26E5 does indeed have 7.3 quality armor…
But it also has 5.7 level firepower on the other hand, hahah.
So, just like KV-1E, it’s an awkward tank to balance; with this compression, you either put it so high that its gun becomes completely useless in order not to stomp on lower BR tanks with its armor, or keep it lower so it can function.
I think T26E5 facing 5.7s is indecent… but making T26E5 face 8.0s wouldn’t be the right solution, specially when some 7.7s are already too much.
We just need decompression across the board… some tanks face too weak opponents in downtiers, and too strong opponents in uptiers. The margin of opponent strength within a vehicle’s matchmaking is too large.
2 Likes