Conquerer. Mk.2?
Conqueror APDS good??? since when?
I perfectly know how stbz works. If yous top you obtain a very precious time for get the first and critical shot.
T-10 is better than Is-3 in reload, turret rotation and stbz. should be 8.0.
Stats from thousand of players are more reliable than one biased guy opinion.
All the heavies at 7.7 sucks to play, all of them are suffering lol rarely had a great time with them, Conquerer might be the most uptier proof compare to the rest of them just downright helpless against 8.3s, this is a br that suffered the most due to compression, they suck so bad that even making Maus feels like it’s #1 heavy tank for 7.7 lol if anything they are not going anywhere
2 Likes
well youre using the object with barely 600 battles in one month, thats like a 50-60 different accounts(probably much less than that) if they played just 10-12 rounds each, so yeah that data an be easily influenced by specific players using them, just because it uses stats from thousands of people, it doesnt mean that they can offer valuable stats for all vehicles, specially for the less popular ones.
It’s all MZ’s that have 6 seconds realistically.
I disagree, T-64A would be strong af, it’s like VCC80/60 vs unstabilised Leopard 1’s again, except now it would be unstabilised Leopard 1 against T-64A. Even against it’s correct time period enemy, T-62/64A its not ready.
2 Likes
Maybe if it gets APFSDS
both should go down
Just no, T-62 itself is quite lacking even to T-55A
I dont agree with others more but it’s not like this is planned BR changes for me to cover all.
Still more than one guy.
still one guy can be well over 10% of your sample size, just because numbers are bigger doesnt mean that it is better.
No. more numbers means more data is very simple.
No… a low low sample means unreliable data, which is what you have as a claim, specially if there is sort of skill in hand, if you just look at things like kd or win rate while not taking into account others things like if you actually have a decent sample you would get that the ariete amv is one of the best tanks at top tier, which is far from true, being actually one of the worst.
1 Like
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Source 1 - Thunderskill with few hundreds or thousands battles registred.
Source 2- 2 russian mains.
First one is not reliable the second is the accurate !!
Buddy just because they track thousands of batles doesnt mean that they have reliable data for all the vehicles… 600 battles is a short samples by all measures as single players can play docens or even more than a houndred games in one month. because again if you take all data of thunder skill as an absulute you will get things like this:
1 Like
@Nowel
I try again.
According to you, the web can track 600 battles is not a reliable source due the low number of battles. So if this is not enough for support a hipotetical BR change for sure the experience of a single player should be much much reliable, yes or no???
they are not.
I will end it here since it seems like there is no point to even argue if you cant compredhend basic statistics principles and you seem to ignore a show case as to how low sample sizes are missleading.
1 Like
Yeah, I do partially agree with the T-64 thing but Leo A1A1s are 9.0 now aren’t they?
T-64s struggle in anything 0.7 br or higher, and may bounce some rounds in 0.3 higher matches.
I could swap the Beglit to 9.7, but it’s still extremely potent… that’s why I say it should be 10.7, especially given I moved the 2s38 to 10.7
Both KVs going down seems a little off, the Swedish one has the better turret which lends it to have far better survivability as that’s the weak point on the KV-1s. That’s why they should still have a br gap, but just a minor one.
Have you played the obj.122? It’s got better angling than the T-62 and often bounces rounds, while being quite mobile and having the ATGMs as backup weapons.
If i remember correctly, thunderskill only accounts for those whom signed up for it, meaning a lot of players don’t even use it.
So it’s a bit odd @Panzerknacker_31 is trying to use it as a source
And what kind of source are you using for your conclussions???
Probably because he was mad that people want to send up the clovis with clear advatages from the tt equivalent and since he fail at acting like a victim he tried to go with the Whataboutism route.
2 Likes