Uh? Human eyesight is incapable of being hurt by near infrared light like the one on LIDAR, our cornea and lens stops nearly all infrared light, pulse lasers damage CMOS sensors because of their high energy output, the instantaneous energy density can exceed the damage threshold of photodiodes and physically burn the pixels out.
A continuous laser would have a much harder time at achieving this. They are different technologies and work on different principles. A pulse laser IS NOT what DLIRCM uses. It’s in the name “Direct Laser” otherwise it would be named “Pulse Laser” IRCM.
What do you even mean by single?
Dedicated?
If so then ofcourse it is.
IR seekers cannot operate in the visual spectrum because the compounds required do not act in that spectrum.
Dont try to spin such misinformation here.
Ofcourse LDIRCM posseses enough power to burn through material right?
Anythign that can release energy strong enough can burn another thing.
LDIRCM aint it.
Not to mention gaijin models TV seekers as resistant to LDIRCM.
So basically ur coping rn because i didnt say destroy, i said damage, and theres no proof of LDIRCM damaging TV seekers used in the Spike missiles.
Except, the sensor array is not affected by an invisible infrared laser.
EO/TV day channels cannot see into the infrared spectrum, they “might” see a faint purplish light depending on the wavelength of the laser, if it is in the near infrared for example, which is what LIDAR uses. DLIRCM works in the broader, much wider wavelengths of the infrared spectrum. EO/TV sensors would be insensible to DLIRCM.
That is already established in the game’s features, TV is not affected by IRCM.
Arguing that DLIRCM should affect TV/EO seekers doesn’t really matter, for in-game purposes, it just doesn’t. Spike would be unaffected by it in the game if the devs allowed for changing guidance methods.
I made a bug report about iir and ldircm and got denied, they told me my proofs arent good and refuse to elaborate. Seems like gaijis has its own made up proof about ldircm being a hard-kill laser instead a soft-kill.
In no way says mi28nm ldircm its a counter for IIR, or it should be named LDIIRCM not LDIRCM. Rest of the info abput this countermeasure still classified.
It is not about being correct or not it is about being able to proof your point or not and stating that they have no proofs is not way to proof your point.
Except that EO/TV guidance is unaffected by DLRICM in game, why would Spikes, which have a dedicated EO channel be affected by it? All of a sudden Gaijin’s definition went from soft kill to hard kill DLIRCM.
Which is plainly wrong and ridiculous to even consider, these systems cannot do any real damage to TV seekers other than heat them up IRL.
Uhm? All of the TV guided missiles that work in the visible spectrum? EO aka “electro optical” is a form of TV guidance. Spikes have a dual mode EO and IR channel.
They could (and should) give it resistance to LDIRCM. It’s literally just a single line of code.
My guy TV/EO seekers are not affected by DLIRCM. Gaijin is hellbent on the idea that a source must state “resistance to DLIRCM” when we know for a fact that Spike’s EO guidance is said counter-countermeasure.
The IRIS-T brochure quite literally states “high resistance to laser jamming” but they simply don’t care. Which is honestly pathetic and gives credence to the idea that they are deliberately sabotaging the game for their own selfish and egotistical reasons.
