Except, the sensor array is not affected by an invisible infrared laser.
EO/TV day channels cannot see into the infrared spectrum, they “might” see a faint purplish light depending on the wavelength of the laser, if it is in the near infrared for example, which is what LIDAR uses. DLIRCM works in the broader, much wider wavelengths of the infrared spectrum. EO/TV sensors would be insensible to DLIRCM.
That is already established in the game’s features, TV is not affected by IRCM.
He needs a fresh new job at the local M’cD
You know what good luck with that if you keep saying that they will definitely listen.
Whether the devs listen or not has nothing to do with them being correct.
Arguing that DLIRCM should affect TV/EO seekers doesn’t really matter, for in-game purposes, it just doesn’t. Spike would be unaffected by it in the game if the devs allowed for changing guidance methods.
I made a bug report about iir and ldircm and got denied, they told me my proofs arent good and refuse to elaborate. Seems like gaijis has its own made up proof about ldircm being a hard-kill laser instead a soft-kill.
In no way says mi28nm ldircm its a counter for IIR, or it should be named LDIIRCM not LDIRCM. Rest of the info abput this countermeasure still classified.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/u4JgoGRIemjf
It is not about being correct or not it is about being able to proof your point or not and stating that they have no proofs is not way to proof your point.
Except that EO/TV guidance is unaffected by DLRICM in game, why would Spikes, which have a dedicated EO channel be affected by it? All of a sudden Gaijin’s definition went from soft kill to hard kill DLIRCM.
Which is plainly wrong and ridiculous to even consider, these systems cannot do any real damage to TV seekers other than heat them up IRL.
Who has EO guidance in the game right now ?
Uhm? All of the TV guided missiles that work in the visible spectrum? EO aka “electro optical” is a form of TV guidance. Spikes have a dual mode EO and IR channel.
They could (and should) give it resistance to LDIRCM. It’s literally just a single line of code.
Why ? TV seeker could have different sensetivity than IR one.
Good old tactics of yours well at least new word i hope so.
So they should listen to what YOU believe in huh ?
You free to make your own game and set your own rules.
My guy TV/EO seekers are not affected by DLIRCM. Gaijin is hellbent on the idea that a source must state “resistance to DLIRCM” when we know for a fact that Spike’s EO guidance is said counter-countermeasure.
The IRIS-T brochure quite literally states “high resistance to laser jamming” but they simply don’t care. Which is honestly pathetic and gives credence to the idea that they are deliberately sabotaging the game for their own selfish and egotistical reasons.
And to works as it need active datalink which is not present in game.
DIRCM is not equal to LDIRCM, DIRCM could be Ka-52 lamps which is usless against IRIS-T.
This is attached in that report
Well here is the thing one source says it can and other says it can’t and modern blinding lasers is not direct statement that it resistant to LDIRCM.
Which source says it can’t?
On the answer from technical moderator.
This source itself states the same thing.
Blooming occurs. Which i have shown in my OP.
And damage occurs only with a high power laser during longer exposure times…
Blooming is easily countered with feature detection and or HOJ.
It’s not flashlight or a lamp.
If it has a songle point of origin, it can be homed on.
Your argument presented no logic.
And fyi a laser is more akin to a flashlight than a lamp.