Pre-order: Puma u14

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
293

I found you defending it by bringing up other just as OP vehicles, can’t even remember your own words?

Oh look, that’s me admitting BMPT was dominant back at 10.3 and totally agreeing with it going to 11.3.

“If BMPTs at 11.3 were indeed so dominant”

The same laddie that seemingly said he’s apparently fine with them moving to 12.0 now, after weeks of getting demolished by people in the BMPT threads, of course.

Oh look, that’s me admitting BMPT was dominant back at 10.3 and totally agreeing with it going to 11.3.

“They don’t look really indimidating”

Downplaying much? :)

Searched through the forum for topics regarding 2A7V and best I could find were threads with ID 56810 and 58302, with former being much more popular. The most liked comments in there basically were in line of: “well, deal with it” .

I found a bunch, it was usually grouped with the 122B+ on top.

So when 2A7V was, by your own admission, by far the most dominant vehicle it got very limited attention with massively conflicting views.

Funnily, I was there for it, so I know it didn’t get “very limited attention” lol.

Or this forum is inherently biased towards the west due to it being a mostly west-oriented place to moan ?

Thank you for your opinion, it’s wrong.

Loads of western vehicles will fly under the radar for months and years, while every single USSR addition for which it isn’t glaringly obvious it’s DOA will be talked about and discussed like it’s second coming of Jesus.

Nobody is trying to claim non-OP vehicles are somehow OP, in other news, cars found crossing a bridge.

Su-27/SM were not really talked about, Tunguska was to a degree back on the old forum, when it could see through time itself and lock targets through the ground, T-80B/U and a bunch of others aren’t being talked about as OP either, and they’re not DOA either - BVM is sometimes brought up from what I can see, but i feel it’s PTSD from its days of dominance back in 2021 & 22.

On the other hand, the vehicles/addition that are genuinely broken/OP, are talked about - THAT’S LOGICAL (maybe not to you). Mi-28NM w/LMURs, LDIRCM (across the board), BMPT(s), SM-SV, the Kh-38MTs which ruined ground RB just as much as many other things, if not more.

We had SLM threads before LDIRCM helis made it irrelevant, for example, it didn’t fly under the radar. T58 (which you really liked bringing up every time you were defending the BMPT) didn’t either, TURM III had its fair share.

I don’t play air much so I can’t speak for how “West” vs “East” is exactly performing there currently, but Rafale for one was VERY TALKED ABOUT, so was the EFT, so were the F-16s, F-15E, the GR.7, even Tornado’s w/LGBs were a pretty common topic before Pantsir made them redundant (well it was mostly rusmains complaining about them tho).

So, I don’t think you, of all people, should be bringing up “biases”.

3 Likes
294

That’s not defending it, that’s just exposing some double standards in this community.

Even in the thread you’re taking screenshots from I’ve said it’s a good thing they moved to 11.7 and that TT one could go to 12.0 if needed. Not my fault you forgot about that one because you were too busy raging, considering I haven’t really agreed with your delusional idea.

How am I downplaying anything by just describing one of my first encounters against it, like a week after it’s release ?

Seems like someone is grasping at straws and need to use people’s first impression posts as some sort of a gotcha moment lol.

So what thread was bigger than ID 56810 ?
The only one I found is 68716 and haven’t seen rivers of tears about them either.

Yeah I saw you there playing it off.

I mean you can believe whatever you want, not my issue.
Just saying that this forum is mostly for western, English speaking players and people are easily biased towards their own country. Nothing to be seen here, am I right ?

I’ve seen a lot of threads about vehicles like Object 775, BUK or the new BTR where they were praised as divine creatures ready to took over their BRs while being “totally untouchable”.

What ?
Su-27 was the subject of so many moan threads due to the so called “27ER dominance in the day and age of 100m MP height”, all the while Gripen was flying under the radar just clubbing everyone in furballs.

27ER fearmongering was probably one of the most common things you’d find on the forum back then.

Considering not one but two 122s existed at the time of BVM’s addition really puts a question mark over that whole dominance. But I guess forum has to complain about something.

Most of the SLM whine threads ended up with 10-15 replies and died two days later.

Considering the crazy numbers it was pushing out, T58 definitely hasn’t got enough “credit” for that. It even received several “defend” threads along the way.
It got moved up in BR recently but it’s still doing better numbers than Terminators of the World, which is a fun little story.

As for Turm III, in the past several years there were like 5-10 threads about it (mostly dead after 20 replies) while being the undisputed king of it’s BR for years. What I found to be funny is how T-72B3 Arena received similar amounts of attention in the month around it’s release as Turm III did in literal years.

This forum simply isn’t that keen to go on months long screeching runs about western vehicles, even if situation is right.

Sorry that I’ve burst your bubble of believing this forum is some sacred place of utter knowledge and understanding, where balance and fairness are the only things that matter while those pesky “rusmains” are plaguing it with their biases. Riding your high horse per usual, I guess therapy is taking it’s toll.

1 Like
295

In a thread not for it, and when told to make a thread for them, you never did - all you cared for was changing the goalpost.

Not my fault you forgot about that one because you were too busy raging, considering I haven’t really agreed with your delusional idea.

You outright stated BMPTs weren’t oppressive because Gaijin didn’t put them to 12.0 outright, that is what I’d call delusional.

Seems like someone is grasping at straws and need to use people’s first impression posts as some sort of a gotcha moment lol.

In a thread of many many other people showing the opposite? Seems like you’re the one who was/is.

Yeah I saw you there playing it off.

By saying it could be stronger/is already nerfed?

Lol.

Just saying that this forum is mostly for western, English speaking players and people are easily biased towards their own country. Nothing to be seen here, am I right ?

And said forum has complained a lot about things that are non-Russian, but since Russia is the one causing majority of issues nowdays, especially at top tier, it gets the most attention.

Seems logical to most, not you though. You believe there must be some mystical “bias”.

I’ve seen a lot of threads about vehicles like Object 775, BUK or the new BTR where they were praised as divine creatures ready to took over their BRs while being “totally untouchable”.

BTR-82AT? Absolutely nobody.

BUK? I guess at first, but nowdays nobody, same with SLM ;)

Su-27 was the subject of so many moan threads due to the so called “27ER dominance in the day and age of 100m MP height” , all the while Gripen was flying under the radar just clubbing everyone in furballs.

It was only a subject due to its weaponary, same as MiG-29s of Russia/other nations that had it, but a lot more discussion was about its atrocious FM.

27ER fearmongering was probably one of the most common things you’d find on the forum back then.

Which it wasn’t, the 27ER was by far the best SAHR missile, I played the 29A 9.12 and 29G before Gaijin added ARHs, even with other aircraft having far better radars, FMs, and more CMs, the ER was still allowing me to always get 2 kills consistently, w/R-73s it was genuinely easy to club even Grippens.

Yeah, sorry to burst your bubble of revisioning everything.

Considering not one but two 122s existed at the time of BVM’s addition really puts a question mark over that whole dominance. But I guess forum has to complain about something.

Again with the revisionist narrative? BVM was outright clubbing everything at the time. That’s why there were so many BVM threads, that’s why people were digging through code.

You’re not helping yourself, many people played through that ERA, me included, I even grinded the BVM out during it, spaded it, and have barely played it since then only to preserve my stats in it, as a reminder of how dominant it was.

Then again, you were defending the BVM back in its heyday back on the old forum lol, so it’s to be expected you’d try to lie.

Considering the crazy numbers it was pushing out, T58 definitely hasn’t got enough “credit” for that. It even received several “defend” threads along the way.

image
image1013×302 75.4 KB

I wonder why.

This forum simply isn’t that keen to go on months long screeching runs about western vehicles, even if situation is right.

I’d wager because these Western vehicles rely on overpowered gimmicks rather than themselves being broken in several ways, like BMPTs DM, its lack of spread while lasing everything.

Sorry that I’ve burst your bubble of believing this forum is some sacred place of utter knowledge and understanding, where balance and fairness are the only things that matter while those pesky “rusmains” are plaguing it with their biases. Riding your high horse per usual, I guess therapy is taking it’s toll.

Bubble? Your meds must be wearing off lad. I’m aware nearly every faction has its own beliefs and biases, but none of them really tries to act like “balance advocates”, nor seems to try and hide when something is OP, except for you. You put on a goody-two-shoes act of “caring”, but you always run straight to defending everything Russian, pretending there’s balance, but also always being one of the first to come in and complain about how X non-Russian vehicle/nation did something first/was somehow broken, but drop the facade once confronted - like with the Ka-52 vs UHT.

You’re a hypocrite of astronomical proportions.

2 Likes
296

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

297

Trust me as a former mod, all mods have equal access to talk to the devs. We cant just synq our brainwaves up the chain. We have to sit and wait patiently aswell lol. can confirm

298

2 Additional Reports Regarding the Puma IFVs have been forwarded and this is what could change on them!:
Puma IFV (All) Insufficient Rear Protection → Rear Armor: 15mm RHA → 40mm RHA (Resistant to 14.5mm)
Puma IFV (All) Insufficient Side Protection (Duplicate) → Overall Much Higher Increased Armor Protection on the Side (30mm KE Proof)

299

To me it just says duplicate

Has in closed has duplicate no forwarding or changes planned

300

Yep that is correct, though there are Reports even from the old Forum that are still hanging around and are still considered. (btw those Reports are roughly 4 Years old by now)

301

Good news:

3 Likes