I’d love to know if Gaijin will equip the Leo2A4M with a DM53
DM53A1 is the standard ops APFSDS round
I think gaijin might consider the game balance and equip leo2a4m with dm43?
It would not be historical. Gaijin chose to model it as a mid 2010s version of the tank so there is no reason other than arbitrary decision making. If they want to add the 2A4M as a premium but don’t want it to be 11.7, add the first 2A4M that didnt feature the upgraded thermals and would be firing DM33A2.
I think gaijin has very oddly specific standards for commonwealth
The PSO and 122B+ are in entirely different classes of survivability.
Yes, i am strictly speaking about the side add on
1 Like
Ah, that was something I had missed
1 Like
Wha ?
T-90M can tank shots CR2 is a one shot because of its ammo placememt.
T-90M also has a far batter round and a consitent reload, CR2 gets 4 rounds at 5/4 seconds and the rest at 7.
Yes it cant reverse or turn, it makes up for that with working ERA, Spall liners and great straight line speed.
There really is nothing the CR2 does well
It wont be 11.3 if they do the 2A5 is 11.7
I don’t care anymore, let it go
3 Likes
Doesn’t change the fact that the T-90M is faster than the chally 2 (bar the 2E). I should have specified that the T-90M has better acceleration and forward speed than the chally 2 instead of using the word mobility as it includes all aspects of the tank relating to motion including reverse, turning, etc as that was not my intent.
T90M has better gun handling, optics, gun and rounds, armour and straight line speed and survivability.
CR2 has…a reverse gear
Kv-1B moment
KV-1B was an event vehicle replicating a Finnish-service tank. Seeing Finland’s affiliation during the early war… I don’t see why it should be different.
I’d argue the Chally has the better optics.
1 Like
Both have Gen 3 I think, fair point though
It would be great to get some Canadian voices.
1 Like