give it 7P and fix 54 didnt make it 13.3 bro. Its still 13.0 if it not get 120.
3 Likes
7P are standard as 27ER in 13.0.
I play this plane for 4 year, Its only be 13.0 not up than this if didnt get AMRAAM (that it will didnt get it.)
Either youre not good with the tomcat or you are being disingenuous and have a strong K/D in the plane and i cant tell which it is.
“plz buff OP plen plz” when it already has better engines, better radar and better missiles than the TT ones. demanding more to its arsenal is going to push it to the point of not being at the BR where its meta, but in the BR where its everyone elses chew toy (where it belongs)
Kill in tomcat the most i got for dogfigth. Not a Pheonix and now i only play 18E. its not an OP plane bro its have a big mistake than you think. You can ask every one in here why they awaiting for this model. And you will got same answer.
2 Likes
Just clam down we are find the way out to make community happy not figth agin.
i mean the quality of players around that BR is poor, and you dont need to worry about the hugely undertiered F-15. makes sense that a tomcat can still do ok even outside of where its strongest, BVR.
certainly a choice…
one of these normally:
its the last of the tomcats. fair answer and the group im in for wanting its addition
better engines & radar - maybe the better pheonix too. should have it higher than the B along with IRAF
AMRAAM, however the the software for integration was cancelled and makes that reason futile.
WT players live off of rage and cope. Gaijin works off that too with their pay to progress/premium vehicle model.
1 Like
Not if we convince gajin production vehicles should also get access to armament that was successfully tested
1 Like
Ahhhh my bad im so sorry.
My bad, Im sorry.
need to convince gaijin to give us what vehicles actually had first. It took 16 years for APHE to be added to british tanks so getting to the point of theoretical/planned weapon mountings for vehicles probably wont happen this decade
2 Likes
Than if it got 7P I think it so ok at this point.
the F-14B and D wouldnt be able to datalink with the 7p so it would be pointless to have it over a 7m.
Oh thats sadly.
I think they should give F-14A Late as a premuim but god they are make D model as premuim. A Late model could be a good premium and people will not mad as this happen in current.
Since when couldn’t f14D use aim7P?
1 Like
personally i think the IRAF should have been the premium and the D as a TT addition.
people were always going to be mad about the F-14D no matter what, people think it was this godlike aircraft that was cut off from showing what it was worth. when really the hornet was fully the way to go and keeping tomcats around was excessive and expensive.
1 Like
it could use them but not as people would want. It was notabug’d by gaijin as either they have info or is pretending that its APG-71s inability to use datalink found on the aim 7p. If the 7p was mounted it could only act like a 7m from this.
I couldnt tell you if gaijin is lying or not, my specialty is the CVR family of scout vehicles and not an american plane though.
Because it is beast of a aircraft f14D uses irst/tcs/apg71 can carry aim54c+ ,aim7p,aim9m would it had more time and funding the f-14D would been the f15E of the navy and the st21/asf14 would’ve been as competitive or even better than most 4.5 gen today
3 Likes
