That would be incredible, giant middle finger to gaijin then
It won’t happen though as they quit making parts for the F14 a long time ago, the one they want to fly again prolly won’t ever fly unless they spent a few million to get it sky worthy
not 12.3 or 12.7 plane.
did you really think they they add something better then the f14a back then when theyr were getting a lot attention from low iq us aviation players *OMG TOMCAT type of person.
son… quit the game
F-20 / XF5U just in top of my head.
When will you understand that Gaijin runs on double standards? They’ll push the bar when it benefits them, but then hold strong on the imaginary line they created.
5 Likes
F-20 (literally made to be exported) wasn’t suppose to be a proto but Lockheed Martin lobbied the US government to push the F16 as the jet that they exported, the US also never planned on using the F20 for their own military, so it should’ve went to another countries tech tree anyways and you have a paywall for a proto jet while the yak 141 is F2P
The XF5U is a proto but low tier that’s why I said below 4.3 but I wasn’t thinking of that
Yeah you’re right they skipped over many aircraft when the entire line when coulda stuck the MiG-25, TU-128, MiG-31 from 9.3-12.0 in that exact line
And btw with the Mig31 wich version because that depends all
Any early version that could sit between 9.3 and 12.0 but they went from yak 38 straight to yak 141
the early version of the mig31 has a pesa radar
and the r33 no way in hell will that one sit below 12.0
1 Like
mig31b is a 12.7 minimum.
Yeah that’s why I said TT MiG-25 aswell, besides gaijin is very likely to add an overpowered Russian vehicles at a lower BR anyways, there was plenty of room to add things from 9.7-12.7
R33 aren’t even in the game, they would most likely add it for their special love Russia, but like they say with the F14D and “balancing issues” they can just leave the R33s off the airframe
Nope.
You’re in a F14D chat where everyone are complaining about the aim 120s and 54C+ cause they won’t add it because of “balancing issues” they can release a MiG-31 w/o R33s but they wouldn’t do that
Oh yhea, thats the why i told you wich versión of the Mig-31 because they have more than 10 versions
Sit on 9.3 holly fake
there is no A2A variant of the Mig-25 that could be added
then we can leave the Pheonix of all the Tomcats
lol, in a f-14 is like the worst idea. you would have to give up at least 3 radar missiles lmao
I wonder how much feedback is needed to change the developers mind on this
1 Like
There is other A2A 25s but they already gave the best MiG-25 it should’ve been the 25PD in the TT and the MiG 25P shoulda been the event one
THEY ALREADY ARE LEAVING PHOENIXS(54C+) OFF THE F14D
MiG 31 carried like 8 different missiles
First gen R33 wouldn’t have more range or G overload than phoenixes either
Why is gajin so keen on forcing the F-14D (the supposed to be upgrade over the F-14B) to stay at 13.0 at the same exact BR of the older model? It is infact an U P G R A D E, and i do not understand why the company seems to be trying to hold it down? I would argue that damn near everyone would have expected the F-14D to be at a higher br, bc guess what. It should have BETTER armament, since thats half as to what the F-14D was upgraded on.
To add onto this, people are already upset about it being premium, but even the people like me where i’m not crazy upset about the premium aspect. I’m crazy upset about the fact that its not even worth what it costs, because its not what is advertised
(Its advertised as an F-14D, but lacks about 65% of what made it an F-14D)
6 Likes
The only thing i can ask is if the f14D will get the aim54C+/Sealed and the aim7P?
2 Likes