False the KH-38MT
Tis’ one of the sad realities of our compression woes being at Gaijin’s whim
no correlation
All the correlation. None of the aircraft in the game have mounted a 38MT.
It’s that kinda biased tho? Russia had plenty of other planes they could added before yak 141 but they didn’t.
“Well since the US made thousands of jet types, we will punish them for it” doesn’t seem like a great idea
1 Like
The way they roll. I don’t agree with it. But that’s what it is. It’s why when someone says oh this is Gaijins rules I mention the things that break them.
Ok so you even agree that it is BS, I may as well quit playing now cause I really wanted the YF-23 when 5th gens start coming out
Mfw the BS game is filled with BS. News at 11.
2 Likes
Oh I’ve agreed. With the YF-23 it might be an exception though with how few 5th Gen exists. If they do it would probably be a premium. But who knows.
1 Like
I’ve known it is filled with BS, I remember they added the BMPT(2010)in the same BR as the M1 abrams(1970)
Also took them a minute to raise it’s BR. And they probably still need to raise it after the ERA buff
1 Like
Umm not really. Yak-141 was qute literally the only available option after Yak-38 and was added at the perfect time when baseline MiG-29’s were still being added to other nations (such as Germany).
They didn’t have to add a yak. They are currently adding other aircraft that could have been there then.
Such as?
TU-128,MiG-31,TU-160 were all real and carried real weapons, but they decided it was best to add a prototype, so they honestly should do the same for the US, every single US vehicle past BR 4.3 is real so why not let the US have just 1 proto jet
Thats like saying they shouldnt add F-15GE because B1 Lancer could be added instead. I honestly dont know where are you going with this.
The TU-128 could have absolutely fit in that line and so could the MiG-31, they also coulda added a TT mig25 there too, I understand the TU-160 not fitting there but why even add a proto before real aircraft that were introduced to actual militaries
I dont wanna be a d!ck, but as a reminder that we’re here to express our dissatisfaction with the F14D premium, not to argue about the YaK 141
5 Likes
So? It still doesn’t take away the fact the f14D is capable of using aim120A and all that was needed was a software update also it shouldn’t matter either if it’s a production vehicle or prototype vehicle to be able to have access to weapons that x vehicle tested successfully and one small thing was missing like a software update for the apg71 witch no question about is capable of using modern technology like AMRAAMs,aim7p,aim54c+
5 Likes
By their criteria its F-14A that could potentially receive AIM-120, not the F-14D. At the same time there is evidence suggesting that F-14A would never be able to use datalink with AIM-120 as it only ever tested them in STT setting.