In the same sense that Su-30MK2 is a 13.3, right?
However, this does not mean that the missile remained a prototype. Direct confirmation of its serial production and operational service deployment is contained in two official documents that must be cited together:
3 Likes
F2 wins in close combat 100 out of 100. The fact that you can’t dodge missiles and get close is just a skill issue. Like f14D will win. Su30 only has good rocket count
11 Likes
It very much does, your whole argument is that it didn’t see service and production ended with the C, despite production of the C+ starting in 1986, 6 years before production of the Phoenix ended.
The F-14D on the other hand saw service up to 2006, when there would be C+'s in the inventory.
The important part is also in 1988 when the C+ was declared to reach IOC, which does mean it entered service as IOC declares that a weapon/vehicle is ready for service.
5 Likes
Just because they were in storage doesn’t mean they can be used by F14D.
Maybe it’s a story like with the AIM120, where the F14D can’t launch.
And all testing was carried out on individual F14A models, on flying laboratories.
Hopefully br 14.3 soon
There is definitive evidence the F14D Operated with AIM54C ECCM/SEALED using the LAU 132 launcher, just look it up. Its not that hard.
3 Likes
I didnt said a word about aim-120 on F-14D. For F-14D were created AIM-54C+ . Just check documents, go
1 Like
So far I don’t see any evidence.
So far I haven’t seen any instructions in any document about launching and acceptable angles for Aim54C+ to launch from 14D
There’s not even a word about 7P.
If you didnt seen that, it doesnt mean the fact about AIM-54C+ Were created first of all for F-14D
you must be ragebaiting
5 Likes
Done, I clicked the main one 👍 Thank you for work on suggestions 🍻
2 Likes
Wouldn’t put it past someone who says the 141 firing 73s is more believable than the missile developed and tested for an aircraft not being compatible for the aircraft.
3 Likes
Facts
ask about the yak now
This is off-topic.
No way you just said the statement it asked chatgpt and believe that is a reliable answer.
10 Likes
That’s why I’m asking for evidence that clearly states the missile was used, not indirect evidence.
Theres not a direct operational document because it hasnt been declassified yet. But you cant sit here and say that the devs require that to add a missile? Because then you have to be able to find that for every missile in the game, its inconsistent logic you are using
2 Likes