Its same situation as AIM-120 that test on F-14. I think who are idiot was you in this point. Base USSR PLA player in War Thunder. HA HA HA Cry harder.
1 Like
Could VS. Did… The F14D COULD carry AIM 120’s and COULD carry AGM88A’s and COULD carry AIM 7P’s… The devs wont give the F14D any of those because there isnt PROOF, not Evidence, but PROOF that it carried them operationally and not just testing. So give us the PROOF the Yak did it and we will give it to you.
6 Likes
The problem everyone on the US side has is that everything we get needs definitive evidence that it was used operationally, not even just carried and thats what the Devs base it on. We are upset and feel there is bias because it seems sometimes the Russian Aircraft get things that are just on paper and not always real.
4 Likes
This appears to be a bug report rather than a suggestion. The AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed was historically used by the F-14D according to some sources, so if the missile is missing from the aircraft’s available loadouts, that would fall under historical implementation rather than a new suggestion.
There is already an accepted bug report covering this issue:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BkYSRNHHzkx1
As well as a duplicate report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UHDWCQSlI80k
I’d recommend supporting the existing bug report rather than submitting it as a suggestion.
6 Likes
Weapons are a balancing factor. That’s been said more than once.
Are you listening to yourself?
Apparently its not a balancing factor for the us
3 Likes
when there f15 is much better to use f14-> f15, su27-> su30
No soviet TT SU30M/M2, no TT 14D
You know the f14 and f15 are different aircraft right?
While su30 su27 are pretty much the same thing
Just a slightly larger dual seater
Maybe take a look at the Su-27PU and Su-27UB
1 Like
Its not your game, for discussing balancing or not it is. Devs told us it is.
Looks mean nothing, it is a successor to the Su-27, just as the F-15 is a successor to the F-14.
So the su27 is also technically a su17?
Its a successor yes but a totally different aircraft
2 Likes
Dammmm he think F-15 are same as F-14 By run number 14 15 oh godddddddd!!! That guy are sickkkk.
1 Like
That’s not the issue, the issue is that the KH38MT is thermal, the KH38 family was never equipped with thermal seeker heads, either way, off topic.
4 Likes
Exactly. That’s why you’re asking for the F-14D in the tech tree, just as I’m asking for the Su-30M/M2 in the tech tree.
Now u get it. Same story
To be fair if the us used the French naming system everything would be labeled tomcat
Swing wing tomcat 1
Solid wing tomcat 2
Single engine tomcat 3
Low speed cas naval tomcat 4
Low speed cas naval tomcat 4 2000
Tomcat 5 for the f15e becouse why not
1 Like
This is coming from someone who thinks the Yak is fake plane. Hahaha.
I dont mind it as a premium I just wish it had more accurate weapons, and probably a higher BR because its a better B at the same BR its lowkey pay to win
1 Like
Then we need to call F-14Tomcruise to make different 👍
Hey smart guy I didn’t tell you YAK are fake, I tell it’s armament like R-73 R27ER that it naver use. Oh boy your understanding are negative. I think I said it clearly.
2 Likes
The Yak-141 was never weaponized.
The one we have in game is a tissue plane that doesn’t exist
8 Likes