THEN WHY DONT YOU WANNA SEE BETTER WEAPONS???
f14D at 13.3 is unplayable
You don’t know that.
Proof?
4 Likes
I mean, they wanted it, that’s why they funded it. Problem is politics got involved, and so it kinda became ‘either or’ and with Desert Storm having been a thing, and the Cold War effectively over at the time, it makes sense to improve ground attack over air to air. When you have a guy who’s basically gone ‘I don’t want this to exist’, and he basically controls what you get - even when everyone below him is going ‘okay but seriously we need this’ - this kinda nonsense happens, so instead of around 300+ F-14D’s, you get about 30 of them with a few rebuilt in to 14D’s to total 55 of them.
since they’re putting them on boats and drones that OBVIOUSLY means the Yak141 carried them
but you want to see definitive proof of the F14D capabilities, and your only proof of the yak 141 is “they’re strapping them to boats and drones” you’re soo fucking biased it’s ridiculous
3 Likes
He’s actually right for once. With its current missiles it would be terrible at that br.
That’s cause the yak couldn’t fire any missile it never made it far enough to be wired.
1 Like
So it couldn’t fire its missile in its real life config?
2 Likes
Considering the Japanese F2A premium is at 13.0 it may not even need to move with a better load out.
At its current state it’s unplayable at 13.0 phoenixes are underpowered, the F14D and even the F14B is basically just a flight sim right now
All I want to see is aim 7Ps and an improved 54C. Keep it at 13.0.
I think that’s fair.
Only thing from what I’ve seen mounted on it was wooden mock-up missiles
genuinely the biggest problem with the F14D is that most of the info is still classified, hopefully that will change though. I think this is the case I am not entirely sure. Because Ive heard a lot of things from ex-navy but who knows if its true.
1 Like
Na its literally just gaijin being a … Can’t find a friendly word
1 Like
I mean, that’s gonna depend on which game mode, I don’t know about Air Realistic/Sim, but being 13.0 in Arcade Premium F2A’s just get dunked on by all the now 13.0 ARH missile tech tree planes, let alone the 13.3’s like the Su-30’s at their native 13.3 or the 13.0 most people get them to, let alone 13.7’s down in to 13.3, 14.0’s down in to 13.7’s and of course the 14.3’s down in to 14.0. Even after the F-15A finally moved down to 12.7 it’s ‘better’ but at this point, basically anything with SARH and/or IR only needs to not be above 12.3 in arcade.
In Arcade, unless a better version of the AIM-54C operates like the Fakour-90’s, you could give it a better AIM-54, AIM-7P, and AIM-9M, keep it at 12.7, and it’s still gonna just get absolutely wrecked. Again, don’t know about Realistic/Sim but Arcade, once modern ARH like AMRAAM show up, if all you have is SARH your basically hoping your not 1 of the 6+ people he locks and fires on, or that the thing actually hits a mountain or something if there’s actually terrain and he’s actually dumb enough to come in to range without missiles to use your SARH or IR ones. And with how poorly AIM-54’s do in Arcade, you almost might as well only have the SARH and IR ones.
1 Like
Best plane at 13.0 btw. In your head there are only missles, nothing more.
F14D is 13.0 without 54C+/Aim7p
Just kinda took a snippet and didn’t read earlier.
1985
The AIM-54C was deployed to the fleet.June – AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed Missile TECHEVAL completed. First AIM-54C+s delivered to Navy.
1986
March – AIM-54C+ began production and delivery.December – AIM-54C reaches Initial Operational Capability.
1987
March 18 – The first missile launch of an AIM-54A Phoenix by a Naval Air Reserve squadron, VF-301, took place at the Pacific Missile Test Range, Point Mugu, CA.August – AIM-54C+ full-scale development.
1988
July – AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed variant reached IOC; entered service. AIM-54C missiles with improved ECCM are known in the U.S. Navy as AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed.1989
June 6 – First Raytheon-built AIM-54C flight test conducted.1990
August 14 – AIM-54C+ High Power Phoenix first flight test of fully upgraded missile scored a direct hit on a QF-4 drone, demonstrating unprecedented multi-shot launch and leave capabilities.AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed testing started in 1990 and some missiles were retrofitted with modification kits as the AIM-54C Plus upgrade.
1991
Production funding was deleted from the FY1991 budget request.
Production started in 1986, with the first 54C+ being delivered in 1985. Additionally upgrade kits for upgrading 54C’s to C+'s were also provided in the 1990 funding. IOC was also achieved in 1988. The timeline is insanely confusing and probably refers to different versions of the 54C+ that got redacted due to classification, but according to the Navair source, which is gonna be the most reliable since it comes from the US Navy, the 54C+ very much existed and entered service a good bit before production ceased.
2 Likes
Why should I read anything before the first test flight? Does this change anything?
