1 Like
The developers are introducing the bare minimum possible donations in all free games. I don’t know what kind of money-grabbing scheme you’re talking about? You obviously haven’t played other free games; they offer literally unique technology only for money, and sometimes even for gambling chests.
In the end, you can just not buy it. You are not forced to.
We have provided from 50 sources go read the topics for 54s and f-14s…
That’s what are we saying. They don’t listen intentionally.
That’s why everyone is mad.
I want to buy the plane, i’d like a TT one too, but i’d buy that. But the correct plane.
What they do with the 54C ECCM/sealed is practically take its M61A1out and give you a GAU-2/M134 minigun…
Like take the Hispanos from spitfire and give it AN/M2 …different thing and wrong thing.
6 Likes
Where, then, is the exceedingly simple fix for M735?
This means the sources aren’t reliable. Google and Wikipedia are not good sources.
If the developers rejected it, it means they have a more reliable source.
Because the f14A-65-gr is a testing vehicle that test stuff for the f14 in general it tested if the f14 could carry and launch the amraam with digital tech and like I said I’m pretty sure it had the analog awg9 and not the digital apg71 witch is why I say it’s more of a f14B(u) upgrade expect f110 engines that it needs to fully use aim120 that the f14D has everything it needs to use aim120 not to mention the only f14D that was supposed to use aim120
1 Like
“could” This is just a guess. You need to obtain reliable information that the system has been tested and successfully integrated.
I’ve posted enough info for the f14D to come with AMRAAMs already
5 Likes
if you make aim 54 maneuverable like any other radar missile, then it’s Br will be treated same. wanna have only headon doppler at 13.0?
1 Like
would be actually good to have 13.3 yank premium as counterpart to 30mk instead of trashing 12.7
Your sources are not reliable and therefore cannot be accepted by the developer.
That’s what I’m saying the f14D w/aim120 could work at 13.3 and will go up when de compression happens
Bruh wtf are you on about their literally reports from the government them selfs that the devs already used to deny harms for f14 so their are reliable
2 Likes
Nobody’s asked this but what’s your end goal? Why?
2 Likes
Then what is the reason for the failure of the report you created for the developer?
Huh what report?
That didn’t take me to what your talking about and I never posted a report in that forums
Then your evidence doesn’t carry any weight. Because the developer is reviewing changes through this platform. Submit your data there, and we’ll get a response from the developer as to whether there’s enough evidence to support the introduction of aim120 for the f14D version.