Every single person i’ve talked to both in matches, and all of the people i’ve spoken to that actually play top tier all agree that the way its being announced and implemented feels like an absolute joke, and a cheap cash grab. Just because you may not feel a certain way, doesn’t mean everyone else doesn’t either.
The developers are introducing the bare minimum possible donations in all free games. I don’t know what kind of money-grabbing scheme you’re talking about? You obviously haven’t played other free games; they offer literally unique technology only for money, and sometimes even for gambling chests.
In the end, you can just not buy it. You are not forced to.
We have provided from 50 sources go read the topics for 54s and f-14s…
That’s what are we saying. They don’t listen intentionally.
That’s why everyone is mad.
I want to buy the plane, i’d like a TT one too, but i’d buy that. But the correct plane.
What they do with the 54C ECCM/sealed is practically take its M61A1out and give you a GAU-2/M134 minigun…
Like take the Hispanos from spitfire and give it AN/M2 …different thing and wrong thing.
This means the sources aren’t reliable. Google and Wikipedia are not good sources.
If the developers rejected it, it means they have a more reliable source.
Because the f14A-65-gr is a testing vehicle that test stuff for the f14 in general it tested if the f14 could carry and launch the amraam with digital tech and like I said I’m pretty sure it had the analog awg9 and not the digital apg71 witch is why I say it’s more of a f14B(u) upgrade expect f110 engines that it needs to fully use aim120 that the f14D has everything it needs to use aim120 not to mention the only f14D that was supposed to use aim120
Bruh wtf are you on about their literally reports from the government them selfs that the devs already used to deny harms for f14 so their are reliable