wow even the irst isn’t modeled accurately
15 Likes
120A should be for a squadron vehicle. (F-14A-65GR which launched them IRL , or the experimental F-14Ds that mounted but never launched them)
TT and Premium F-14D should both be armed with 9M, 7P, 54C+. TT should be F-14D, prem should be F-14D(R), and both should be at same BR.
1 Like
Oh one thing!!! The F-14D HUD didn’t model correctly and Ejection seat model wrong too in cockpit view. MFD too.
8 Likes
But then why is F-15 on 12.7? The 9M can’t warrant a raise in br. 9M is standard IR missile for that br…
If the F-14D is too good and could go to 13.3 sure, but i cant see that because of just the 9M upgrade alone!
5 Likes
Lol of course. And it’s not like it’s a difficult one to model either.
Anyway this is a photo I took of it from the left side
5 Likes
Guys Smin say B and D model are going to get 9M
6 Likes
D model also needs the correct aim54 and aim7Ps, but where did he say that? You should be able to link it if you can see the comment
3 Likes
plus prior to F-15 going down to 12.7 IRCCM missile on main 4th gens are strictly hold at 13.0 even people keep asking for MiG-29 9-13 (which back then had R-73 removed) to give it back at the cost either raise to 13.0 or remove R-27ER and let it stay 12.7, but then Gaijin chose the former and fill 12.7 with 9-12 MiG-29 with R-60M which it was before with 9-13. Not giving F-14B and D AIM-9M with their BR at 13.0 and above is hypocritical with said F-15A with IRCCM get to stay at 12.7 just because they don’t have HMD and those Tomcats never have those either, they’re not even as agile as Su-27 or MiG-29 that also have HMD combo.
13.0 really is the IRCCM main BR for major fighters, just because JA37DI and F-16A ADF didn’t have it doesn’t mean F-14B and D shouldn’t do too (while actually compatible rather than “fairytale compatible”)
brah I just typing this in the midst of the situation but good to hear, now for AIM-7P and AIM-54C+ on F-14D next
1 Like
9M for the 14B and 14D
7 Likes
Bare minimum.
5 Likes
4 Likes
Yep. Thanks everyone for sharing your feedback.
5 Likes
The preorders must have been terrible for them to act.
1 Like
Next step is fixing the lack of AIM-54C ECCM
2 Likes
Its still not enough, it’s still inaccurate in physical modeling as well as armament. Its a step in the right direction, but still not enough for me to consider buying it
5 Likes
Hopefully, this is just the first step
3 Likes
How about this feedback?
10 Likes
Thanks a lot for hearing us out!
9M is appreciated and a step in the right direction
2 Likes
Currently, the cockpit’s HUD is a repurposed one from the F-14A/B, but are there any plans to produce a dedicated HUD?
The improved cockpit, along with the APG-71 and IRST, is one of the F-14D’s defining features.
As has been widely discussed, there are significant complaints regarding the armament, but if it’s equipped with AIM-9M missiles, I think it’s somewhat acceptable.
If the HUD issue is resolved, I intend to purchase it, but without a guarantee, I can’t commit to the purchase.
4 Likes
There are no plans for this.
1 Like