this response is actually insane, did you forget about su-30 premiums with 10 missile loadout?
If you are asking us for the feedback, can you provide the balancing reasoning behind restricting aim-9m for this aircraft?
18 Likes
Oh no no no no no my dear friend
This is not case of incompetency.
This choice was by design.
You see its not russian aircraft.
Therefore nothing will change.
4 Likes
the point is some pepole like to dont only be high up in air and carry the aim54c some pepole like to just stay close to the ground even in f14 when thats thhe most easy jet to play high in the air they could also have a playstyle like they start going high in the air and when they done with aim54 they could go low to the ground to use aim7 cuz aim54 isint allways a guarantee kill so they try to use the aim7 to try to get kills i have tryed this method and it can work we are stil talking about aim7 so that isint guarantee kill aswell and its more fun cuz you arnt only camping in the air and you get to dogfight more
1 Like
Yeah i can see MiG-29s having great time.
wow even the irst isn’t modeled accurately
20 Likes
120A should be for a squadron vehicle. (F-14A-65GR which launched them IRL , or the experimental F-14Ds that mounted but never launched them)
TT and Premium F-14D should both be armed with 9M, 7P, 54C+. TT should be F-14D, prem should be F-14D(R), and both should be at same BR.
1 Like
Oh one thing!!! The F-14D HUD didn’t model correctly and Ejection seat model wrong too in cockpit view. MFD too.
9 Likes
But then why is F-15 on 12.7? The 9M can’t warrant a raise in br. 9M is standard IR missile for that br…
If the F-14D is too good and could go to 13.3 sure, but i cant see that because of just the 9M upgrade alone!
5 Likes
Lol of course. And it’s not like it’s a difficult one to model either.
Anyway this is a photo I took of it from the left side
6 Likes
Guys Smin say B and D model are going to get 9M
7 Likes
D model also needs the correct aim54 and aim7Ps, but where did he say that? You should be able to link it if you can see the comment
3 Likes
plus prior to F-15 going down to 12.7 IRCCM missile on main 4th gens are strictly hold at 13.0 even people keep asking for MiG-29 9-13 (which back then had R-73 removed) to give it back at the cost either raise to 13.0 or remove R-27ER and let it stay 12.7, but then Gaijin chose the former and fill 12.7 with 9-12 MiG-29 with R-60M which it was before with 9-13. Not giving F-14B and D AIM-9M with their BR at 13.0 and above is hypocritical with said F-15A with IRCCM get to stay at 12.7 just because they don’t have HMD and those Tomcats never have those either, they’re not even as agile as Su-27 or MiG-29 that also have HMD combo.
13.0 really is the IRCCM main BR for major fighters, just because JA37DI and F-16A ADF didn’t have it doesn’t mean F-14B and D shouldn’t do too (while actually compatible rather than “fairytale compatible”)
brah I just typing this in the midst of the situation but good to hear, now for AIM-7P and AIM-54C+ on F-14D next
1 Like
9M for the 14B and 14D
8 Likes
Bare minimum.
5 Likes
5 Likes
Yep. Thanks everyone for sharing your feedback.
5 Likes
The preorders must have been terrible for them to act.
1 Like
Next step is fixing the lack of AIM-54C ECCM
2 Likes
Its still not enough, it’s still inaccurate in physical modeling as well as armament. Its a step in the right direction, but still not enough for me to consider buying it
5 Likes