Because most people don’t feel the need to comment what has already been said?
3 Likes
The dude’s been responding to my comment from days ago:
As well as that I’ve mentioned what 3 or 4 times about keeping the thread on topic?
What’s the purpose of your comment?
Like the original debate was over long ago, now we moved on
Doesn’t look like you moved on. I replied to your comment just from a few hours ago…
The point and reason it’s on topic is because your bias is blatantly against the f14 (probably because you dislike a certain country) and you are using your bias to attempt to discredit a perfectly fine poll ABOUT THE F14D on ridiculous notions.
Begon troll
3 Likes
If someone pings me days later about it, and continues it, then of course I will reply.
At what point have I been biased against the F14?
I’ve actively advocated for it to be represented correctly with correct missile loadouts, even up to the AMRAAMs as technically it was tested with them, thus can mount them.
What certain country would that be? I’ve hundreds of games in my F14s across the 3 variants, I’ve also thousands of games in the US tree if that’s what you’re insuating about xD hell my top vehicle for games played is US.
this is quite literally a straw man argument.
I’ve not used any bias in what I said, where have I brought up how I feel or how I interpret anything and how it’s affected my view of a poll which, as you’ve been shown quite clearly has bot accounts voting on it.
if anyone is having biases here it is yourself in favour of the F14 to the point it is deluding even basic functions of deduction.
I’ve no bias against any nation in game lol, I’ve 9 out of 10 nations at top tier in Ground, and almost all in rank 8 for air.
You’ve played barely 6 thousand games mate in ARB , I’ve over 4 thousand on the first page of vehicles from USA on my stat shark alone. So again, who’s biased xD
Working out my US matches, I’ve stopped on the third page, I’ve 6630 games in USA alone between all ranks, first 45 vehicles.
So yeah I am not biased against USA that makes up over 1/3rd of all my matches in warthunder.
that’s only 15 vehicles BTW
as well as 2055 games in ARB alone with my first 15 US planes, which again makes up more than 1/3rd of all my air battles.
So again, how am I biased VS the US? xD
All this sound interesting, but I just wish for a talisman on my HMS invincible, anyone could help me with ge?
1 Like
Okay. But it doesnt really cancel the fact that bot accounts were used in that poll. And I showed most blatant example.
Also “his opinion on wt forum” part still stands. I only saw him expressing opinion on that exact poll, not entire forum.
1 Like
that is one out of hundreds and it most definitely not definitive evidence, honestly no idea why you’re so personally invested
yea it is always their fault when you are trying to make a joke that nobody understands.
1 Like
Im not that invested, just saw bot theme going here and did brief check until I stumbled upon that triple W. While those 3 look like drop in ocean this raises suspicions and brings a question:“how many ppl who voted there could also be bots and could they skew results bad enough?”. To know exact numbers I would have to do elaborate check but I dont care that much. So Ill just leave it at “maybe”.
3 Likes
Huh - learn something new every day. Everything I ever read seemed to indicate that the F-14A’s all had the TF-30’s removed because of how much of a problem they were for the GE’s - but if that pictures dating is correct that is in fact an F-14A with TF-30’s, but carrying guided ordnance and all.
So - I guess in game they could just call it ‘F-14A (Late)’ cause yeah, that’s actually technically just an F-14A with more stuff and the in game aircraft of the A is already called F-14A (Early). Which means they still have A+ (engines/RWR no bombs), F-14A-65-GR (A that tested AMRAAMs), F-14D(R) (rebuilds of older planes to D), Early F-14D with AMRAAM software patch (6x AIM-120A) and even an option for late F-14D with AMRAAM patch and at least 1 pair of dual racks (8x of any AIM-120C series or earlier AMRAAM), not counting if they also had a reason or desire to throw in rebuild F-14’s with the AMRAAM’s. And I’m pretty sure I’m still missing a variant on that list of all the things they can add.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
Worth 80 euros after the Phoenix changes?
I’m considering dat pre-order.
Nope
8 Likes
Yak-141 was real, don’t recall there being a Kh-38T tho
Complains about selective realism, also wants a missile that’s not realistic to its airframe
1 Like
The aim 120 was fired from the f-14 platform for future use. The Navy instead went the f-18. The yak 141 was a prototype that never went into active service yet. It’s in the game with good missiles. The kh-38mt is not even a real missile yet. It’s used on Russian top-tier planes and you get your ass kicked and ground because of it. I’m not complaining. It’s all valid points
3 Likes
Yak-141 the morale booster lol.
My dude you have 0.3 K/D in an undertiered Click Bait. Everything is overpowered against you.
Many things in this game are prototypes that never entered service.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Yes they can.
Okay there pal…
1 Like