not if it’s been influenced by biased accounts, which it seems to be.
I mean too much drag. Drag doesn’t help slow down and turn better when have the negine power?
It wont, they cant let their precious Su30 Premiums suffer in the slightest 🥀
“Selective realism” With this update being around the corner All we can do is hope the snail does the right thing.
Sad to see P’s being locked behind the F/A-18’s only…
Quote from Warthunder website:
“Over 2,500 highly detailed aircraft, helicopters, ground vehicles, warships and other combat vehicles crafted carefully from historical documents and surviving sources.”
26 Likes
lmao, are the biased accounts in the room with us now?
such a childish and hilarious was way to discredit something you’re unable to refute.
2 Likes
It’s quite literally the truth of it, if htere are barely 60 accounts active on the thread yet almost 10x that voting, it shows there is a discrepancy there.
you do you but mate.
total fking lies man isn’t it
1 Like
uh huh, meanwhile they had no issues downing Iraqi tu22 and mig25, both of which had substantial ecm. honestly do you know why the aim54 was even made?
1 Like
I will, you continue your benign attempts at poisoning the well because it’s not really convincing anyone.
“Russian bots are compromising our fair and honest polls!!”
this is his honest opinion for a warthunder forum. lol
2 Likes
did I say russian? I’ve not said anything about russian bots xD I’ve no idea who you’re quoting there mate.
Wether you choose to understand or not isn’t up to me, continue to blissfully unaware of the multitude of variables that can affect a statistic, poll or survey (especially online) ,results.
there’s about 700 accounts there which have essentially no play time nor forum time, which in of itself is extremely suspicious.
I’m not here to teach you about how or why, you wanna pop off about something to do with russian bots bugger off and do it alone, don’t derail the thread with nonsense.
I rly hope they will add e-war planes under the bomber lineup, at least big plane players will have something to play other than just b29.
TLDR, learn to be more concise, fact if the matter is you’ve no shred if evidence for such claim beyond “trust me bro” and nobody is buying that.
1 Like
b50 (improved b29) was flying way before the tu4, (which flew around the same time as the huge b36) should have been added years ago, but then the tu4 wouldn’t be the best of its class.
The evidence is directly infront of you on said accounts.
I can compile a list of htem if you give me a few days xD if you really want evidence.
The same can be said on the contrary to your point as well, you’ve no way proving those accounts aren’t made speficially to bolster that poll. Other than, trust me bro.
As you say, Now if you’ve nothing to say about the abhorent way the F14D is added then pipe down.
I’ll continue to call out your strawman arguments, the numbers still don’t add up in your favor, even it your “trust me bro” is given as good faith.
You’re not a mod lil bro you don’t control my posting activity
1 Like
anyone who uses lil bro as anything other than try to be funny, is a certified child.
I don’t control your posting activity, I can recommend you to keep it on topic as per Forum ToS and not to derail a post which is what you seem to be doing here.
Also this is not what a strawman argument is at all, I’m not twisting anyones point to then attack that point.
E:G
“I think we should invest more money in public schools and educational programs.”- orignal point
Why do you want to defund the military and leave our country completely defenseless?!" strawman point.
what I am saying is, that the poll, which youc an also read quite clearly is filled with votes from suspicious accounts and thus could sway the data. that is all.
Now again, talk about the F14 or take it to Dms or whatever
1 Like
if 700 out of 1000 accounts seem extremely suspicious, that means the numbers quite literally line up in my favour or is 70 % not in favour of something?
Yes, modern eqipment downing outdatet planes is a very good comparisson.
But yea, IRL was an entirely different story.
But:
Technology advances and for this game modern bombers should not be threatened by long range AAM.
That’s the thing about historical matchmaking sometimes: it is not fun most of the time.
Must be player, their mother and their father who just happened to join same day. Definitely not bots trying to skew result.
He never mentioned russian bots tho?
Also what strawmans are you talking about? You are the one who put “russian bots” in his mouth and said that its his opinion on wt forum.
2 Likes
They’re literally bot accounts.
I was just thinking that I made literally no reference to country of origin xD
by the definition of strawman argument he’s literally just done it.
like that is
oxford dictionary : a weak imaginary opponent or argument that is set up in order to be defeated easily
Example : * The article sets up a straw man: a purposeful misinterpretation of the artist’s position.
His use of russian bots to try murkey the water on what I said is a strawman. TO DEDUCT from my actual argument.
Cambridge dictionary : An argument, claim or opponent which is invented in order to win or create an argument.
So yeah. He’s the one using straw-man arguments rather than I xD
1 Like