total fking lies man isn’t it
2 Likes
uh huh, meanwhile they had no issues downing Iraqi tu22 and mig25, both of which had substantial ecm. honestly do you know why the aim54 was even made?
2 Likes
I will, you continue your benign attempts at poisoning the well because it’s not really convincing anyone.
“Russian bots are compromising our fair and honest polls!!”
this is his honest opinion for a warthunder forum. lol
2 Likes
did I say russian? I’ve not said anything about russian bots xD I’ve no idea who you’re quoting there mate.
Wether you choose to understand or not isn’t up to me, continue to blissfully unaware of the multitude of variables that can affect a statistic, poll or survey (especially online) ,results.
there’s about 700 accounts there which have essentially no play time nor forum time, which in of itself is extremely suspicious.
I’m not here to teach you about how or why, you wanna pop off about something to do with russian bots bugger off and do it alone, don’t derail the thread with nonsense.
I rly hope they will add e-war planes under the bomber lineup, at least big plane players will have something to play other than just b29.
TLDR, learn to be more concise, fact if the matter is you’ve no shred if evidence for such claim beyond “trust me bro” and nobody is buying that.
1 Like
b50 (improved b29) was flying way before the tu4, (which flew around the same time as the huge b36) should have been added years ago, but then the tu4 wouldn’t be the best of its class.
The evidence is directly infront of you on said accounts.
I can compile a list of htem if you give me a few days xD if you really want evidence.
The same can be said on the contrary to your point as well, you’ve no way proving those accounts aren’t made speficially to bolster that poll. Other than, trust me bro.
As you say, Now if you’ve nothing to say about the abhorent way the F14D is added then pipe down.
I’ll continue to call out your strawman arguments, the numbers still don’t add up in your favor, even it your “trust me bro” is given as good faith.
You’re not a mod lil bro you don’t control my posting activity
1 Like
anyone who uses lil bro as anything other than try to be funny, is a certified child.
I don’t control your posting activity, I can recommend you to keep it on topic as per Forum ToS and not to derail a post which is what you seem to be doing here.
Also this is not what a strawman argument is at all, I’m not twisting anyones point to then attack that point.
E:G
“I think we should invest more money in public schools and educational programs.”- orignal point
Why do you want to defund the military and leave our country completely defenseless?!" strawman point.
what I am saying is, that the poll, which youc an also read quite clearly is filled with votes from suspicious accounts and thus could sway the data. that is all.
Now again, talk about the F14 or take it to Dms or whatever
1 Like
if 700 out of 1000 accounts seem extremely suspicious, that means the numbers quite literally line up in my favour or is 70 % not in favour of something?
Yes, modern eqipment downing outdatet planes is a very good comparisson.
But yea, IRL was an entirely different story.
But:
Technology advances and for this game modern bombers should not be threatened by long range AAM.
That’s the thing about historical matchmaking sometimes: it is not fun most of the time.
Must be player, their mother and their father who just happened to join same day. Definitely not bots trying to skew result.
He never mentioned russian bots tho?
Also what strawmans are you talking about? You are the one who put “russian bots” in his mouth and said that its his opinion on wt forum.
3 Likes
They’re literally bot accounts.
I was just thinking that I made literally no reference to country of origin xD
by the definition of strawman argument he’s literally just done it.
like that is
oxford dictionary : a weak imaginary opponent or argument that is set up in order to be defeated easily
Example : * The article sets up a straw man: a purposeful misinterpretation of the artist’s position.
His use of russian bots to try murkey the water on what I said is a strawman. TO DEDUCT from my actual argument.
Cambridge dictionary : An argument, claim or opponent which is invented in order to win or create an argument.
So yeah. He’s the one using straw-man arguments rather than I xD
2 Likes
Because most people don’t feel the need to comment what has already been said?
3 Likes
The dude’s been responding to my comment from days ago:
As well as that I’ve mentioned what 3 or 4 times about keeping the thread on topic?
What’s the purpose of your comment?
Like the original debate was over long ago, now we moved on
Doesn’t look like you moved on. I replied to your comment just from a few hours ago…
The point and reason it’s on topic is because your bias is blatantly against the f14 (probably because you dislike a certain country) and you are using your bias to attempt to discredit a perfectly fine poll ABOUT THE F14D on ridiculous notions.
Begon troll
3 Likes
If someone pings me days later about it, and continues it, then of course I will reply.
At what point have I been biased against the F14?
I’ve actively advocated for it to be represented correctly with correct missile loadouts, even up to the AMRAAMs as technically it was tested with them, thus can mount them.
What certain country would that be? I’ve hundreds of games in my F14s across the 3 variants, I’ve also thousands of games in the US tree if that’s what you’re insuating about xD hell my top vehicle for games played is US.
this is quite literally a straw man argument.
I’ve not used any bias in what I said, where have I brought up how I feel or how I interpret anything and how it’s affected my view of a poll which, as you’ve been shown quite clearly has bot accounts voting on it.
if anyone is having biases here it is yourself in favour of the F14 to the point it is deluding even basic functions of deduction.
I’ve no bias against any nation in game lol, I’ve 9 out of 10 nations at top tier in Ground, and almost all in rank 8 for air.
You’ve played barely 6 thousand games mate in ARB , I’ve over 4 thousand on the first page of vehicles from USA on my stat shark alone. So again, who’s biased xD
Working out my US matches, I’ve stopped on the third page, I’ve 6630 games in USA alone between all ranks, first 45 vehicles.
So yeah I am not biased against USA that makes up over 1/3rd of all my matches in warthunder.
that’s only 15 vehicles BTW
as well as 2055 games in ARB alone with my first 15 US planes, which again makes up more than 1/3rd of all my air battles.
So again, how am I biased VS the US? xD
All this sound interesting, but I just wish for a talisman on my HMS invincible, anyone could help me with ge?
1 Like