These types of clips are fun and all but a single BOL chaff or tighter manuvering would have made the missile overshoot, and at that point the burn phase is already more than halfway done.
The 54 like this will be so fun in Nuke Thunder with full matches 👹 target’s of opportunity a plenty!
Imagine a nuking bomber closing in on your main base just laughing off all radar missiles that are fired at it until they see a single “F14” ping on their RWR before a Aim-54C ECCM guided in by the APG-71 snipes them from spawn.
nuke capable bombers should not killable by long range ECCM AAM.
These beasts are huge so there should be enough room for a huge and really good ECM system.
I can’t imagine how the B 52 could be in service until today otherwise.
And they shouldn’t even face anything above 13.0 imo.
11.0 jets can intercept these bad boys rather easily already, even without AAM
only if the enemy SAM systems do not intercept any of your AIM 54 in time and your targets last long enough for your AAM to impact.
not if it’s been influenced by biased accounts, which it seems to be.
I mean too much drag. Drag doesn’t help slow down and turn better when have the negine power?
It wont, they cant let their precious Su30 Premiums suffer in the slightest 🥀
“Selective realism” With this update being around the corner All we can do is hope the snail does the right thing.
Sad to see P’s being locked behind the F/A-18’s only…
Quote from Warthunder website:
“Over 2,500 highly detailed aircraft, helicopters, ground vehicles, warships and other combat vehicles crafted carefully from historical documents and surviving sources.”
lmao, are the biased accounts in the room with us now?
such a childish and hilarious was way to discredit something you’re unable to refute.
It’s quite literally the truth of it, if htere are barely 60 accounts active on the thread yet almost 10x that voting, it shows there is a discrepancy there.
you do you but mate.
total fking lies man isn’t it
uh huh, meanwhile they had no issues downing Iraqi tu22 and mig25, both of which had substantial ecm. honestly do you know why the aim54 was even made?
I will, you continue your benign attempts at poisoning the well because it’s not really convincing anyone.
“Russian bots are compromising our fair and honest polls!!”
this is his honest opinion for a warthunder forum. lol
did I say russian? I’ve not said anything about russian bots xD I’ve no idea who you’re quoting there mate.
Wether you choose to understand or not isn’t up to me, continue to blissfully unaware of the multitude of variables that can affect a statistic, poll or survey (especially online) ,results.
there’s about 700 accounts there which have essentially no play time nor forum time, which in of itself is extremely suspicious.
I’m not here to teach you about how or why, you wanna pop off about something to do with russian bots bugger off and do it alone, don’t derail the thread with nonsense.
I rly hope they will add e-war planes under the bomber lineup, at least big plane players will have something to play other than just b29.
TLDR, learn to be more concise, fact if the matter is you’ve no shred if evidence for such claim beyond “trust me bro” and nobody is buying that.
b50 (improved b29) was flying way before the tu4, (which flew around the same time as the huge b36) should have been added years ago, but then the tu4 wouldn’t be the best of its class.
The evidence is directly infront of you on said accounts.
I can compile a list of htem if you give me a few days xD if you really want evidence.
The same can be said on the contrary to your point as well, you’ve no way proving those accounts aren’t made speficially to bolster that poll. Other than, trust me bro.
As you say, Now if you’ve nothing to say about the abhorent way the F14D is added then pipe down.
I’ll continue to call out your strawman arguments, the numbers still don’t add up in your favor, even it your “trust me bro” is given as good faith.
You’re not a mod lil bro you don’t control my posting activity