Is this valid?
N88-NTSP-A-50-8007C/ A ?
I found it in global security org so it must be unclassified…
The document code N88-NTSP-A-50-8007C/A refers to the official Navy Training System Plan (NTSP) for the AIM-54 Phoenix Missile, which was approved in April 1999
N88: Designates the sponsor, which is the Office of the
Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) for Warfare Systems.
NTSP: Stands for Navy Training System Plan. These documents dictate the manpower, personnel, and training (MPT) requirements for new or modified naval hardware.
A-50: The system category code for guided missiles.
8007: The specific weapon system identifier for the AIM-54 Phoenix.
C/A: Indicates this is Revision C, approved as the first edition (A) of that specific
F-14 downtierd to 12.0 ? AND F-16 can upditer to 14.7 , soo
The Aim-54A and C and C+ we have in game all have the Mk47 Mod0 engine, what are you talking about lmao
The degree doesn’t matter, it is objectively better than the tech-tree “equivalent” (Which really shouldn’t be the frakking F-14B) at the same BR.
1 Like
Bro has no clue how a survey is done lol
The F-14D having a better radar than the tech-tree F-14 at the same BR is definitely a paid advantage. I just do not think that radar alone makes the whole vehicle pay-to-win unless the rest of the package also lets it consistently outperform the tech-tree alternative. If the aircraft is still mediocre overall, then it is more of a questionable paid advantage or sidegrade than a clear pay-to-win vehicle.
The Chinese Su-30MKK is a better example: if it is clearly stronger than comparable tech-tree aircraft while also sitting at a favorable BR and benefiting heavily from downtiers, then that is much closer to actual pay-to-win.
1 Like
The air community, which I am a part of lol? so no again, he doesn’t speak for the entire air community either.
Lie all I want about what? Where have I even lied mate xD
I do so , but I also don’t want someone else to claim they can or do speak on my behalf huge difference.
Oh I do mate.
Suggestion for a possible tech tree F-14D (hopefully)
Suggestion passed in like half an hour from submission
Suggestions usually take closer to half a year
13 Likes
Since the addition of new members to our team we have cut down the backlog significantly. At the current rate our backlog will likely entirely be gone by the end of the month or soon after.
12 Likes
That’s amazing. Thank you for y’all’s hard work.
3 Likes
oh absolutely, i know you lot have been cutting that backlog down significantly recently, but 20-30 mins from submission probably won’t become standard even when theres no backlog:)
2 Likes
Any amount of P2W is still P2W, but even beyond that it’s just infuriating that the final service F-14 is now locked behind a walletwall and mediocre because of Gaijin’s continued attempts to sell it as a copy-paste…
Especially as they ignore all the Phoenix bug reports for multiple years, and not even giving the F-14D’s AIM-54C+ a block-60 thruster so it could at least be competitive with the IRIAF (of course, at a higher BR) :/
6 Likes
It is indeed, the worst.
2 Likes
Only from the submission side of things? as you guys usually work as much as you can.
It’s more the implementation as well , like will it take as long as usual?
Implementation of suggestions is not their job
That is the devs and devs alone
1 Like
That’s what I was elluding to.
Thanks
you are welcome guys /j
6 Likes
the self glaze goes crazy
4 Likes
