Not if we convince gajin production vehicles should also get access to armament that was successfully tested
1 Like
Ahhhh my bad im so sorry.
My bad, Im sorry.
need to convince gaijin to give us what vehicles actually had first. It took 16 years for APHE to be added to british tanks so getting to the point of theoretical/planned weapon mountings for vehicles probably wont happen this decade
2 Likes
Than if it got 7P I think it so ok at this point.
the F-14B and D wouldnt be able to datalink with the 7p so it would be pointless to have it over a 7m.
Oh thats sadly.
I think they should give F-14A Late as a premuim but god they are make D model as premuim. A Late model could be a good premium and people will not mad as this happen in current.
Since when couldn’t f14D use aim7P?
1 Like
personally i think the IRAF should have been the premium and the D as a TT addition.
people were always going to be mad about the F-14D no matter what, people think it was this godlike aircraft that was cut off from showing what it was worth. when really the hornet was fully the way to go and keeping tomcats around was excessive and expensive.
1 Like
it could use them but not as people would want. It was notabug’d by gaijin as either they have info or is pretending that its APG-71s inability to use datalink found on the aim 7p. If the 7p was mounted it could only act like a 7m from this.
I couldnt tell you if gaijin is lying or not, my specialty is the CVR family of scout vehicles and not an american plane though.
Because it is beast of a aircraft f14D uses irst/tcs/apg71 can carry aim54c+ ,aim7p,aim9m would it had more time and funding the f-14D would been the f15E of the navy and the st21/asf14 would’ve been as competitive or even better than most 4.5 gen today
3 Likes
please tell me you dont actually think a tomcat would be better than a 21st century peer
1 Like
I think the st21,ast-21, and asf14 would’ve most definitely been as competitive as 4.5 gen aircraft or arguably better while the F14D could’ve have been as competitive as the f15E if it wasn’t for the budget cuts
So you don’t play US at all then, cause the F15GE was doa, the pobit is DOA still, F18C is in a worse state than the pobit, literally the only good “American top tier” is the IRIAF, the MSIP F15 was awesome but theyre slowly destroying it with all the new vehicles being added, even the premiums suck aswell and the F14D isn’t gonna help the US in its current state, I’m curious now, what planes in the US are “solid” besides the GE, they even fucked the F5E aswell, the F5C is in a sorry state
All I can think of is the F8E, F8U2 the F15GE is now only decent, IRIAF, if you wanna get where America excels you literally have to go back to like 9.3 with the F104 and F106
3 Likes
Completely different to the tech tree versions
Allright so that we dont talk purely subjective feelings, name a metric by which aircraft can be considered good. Winrate? KpD?
2 Likes
In real life? it absolutely would have destroyed a few 4.5 gen fighters , but not in game, look at the BMPT(2010s tech) plays the M1 Abrams (1970 tech) constantly, they goes to show how far ahead the US is technologically, other countries are getting things that was made 4-5 years ago in game, they have yet to even add aim 9Xs(1990s tech) to the game yet(air wise) cause it would change the game completely
F14 really is only gonna struggle with Rafale and typhoons IRL cause of meteors, everything else is peanuts
Vidar is 8.0 and was made in 2019
KPD, KPS, also stats that don’t show like death rate, F15GE dies in like 80% of its games while typhoons and rafale die less than 75% of the time
Win rate is a good indicator but they cripple US technology by not adding their actual weapons, if the F15s got their 9X you would see win rates boosted very quickly