Nice Video.
5 Likes
Even if the bug report was better made they would hit you with the ‘This says literally nothing. You can’t compare this data with in-game performance. Do developers have to make AIM-54C worse? How worse?’ because they want measurable and quantifiable datas that is not measurable nor quantifiable, they don’t really understand approximation as they rather see black or white unless it’s russian. The game definitively have capacities to do this has missiles each have their own resistances to flare or chaff but modifying a value to an ’ approximation ’ is taking it too far for them. Probably the same reason why the Namer and the Merkava are SOMEHOW the same weight which is hilliarious.
4 Likes
its so bad too because even if we have literally EVERYTHING that prooves stuff they can just pull the balancing card.
The winrate argument is so outrageous.
Su-30 are great example how they bias.
2 Likes
Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
13 Likes
Ahhhhh 13.3 becuse want our player not play harder. This plane should be at 13.7.
It’s literally better than the 13.7 J-11B, but it got ‘SU’ in the name so here we are.
3 Likes
His arguments and sources would get rejected so hard as a bug report :(
1 Like
True, the premium SU-30 is designed for Tier 13.7; you could add two more ARHs and easily move it up to Tier 13.7, but even with just six Fox 3s, I think it could handle Tier 13.7—it has a very finicky radar and an RWR range of only 30’, but as grinders, they’d still be able to hold their own at a higher BR than they currently have.
7 Likes
Its so funny that the IRIAF F14 gets missiles that are just so much better than the F14D thats supposed to be the best tomcat lol.
12 Likes
Thats a lot of AAM for F 14 Standarts.
+1 would want that aswell.
1 Like
The F-14D was designed knowing it would be phased out within a few years. there was little incentive or funding to develop anything truly revolutionary. Iran, on the other hand, was forced to develop something to ensure their aircraft remained superior. It’s only natural that the Fakour is superior in terms of flight performance. however, the BR is also different one is 13.3 and the other is 13.0.
1 Like
Its so funny that that F14 was added to the US TT. This way I cannot pound any IRGC without obtaining a TK.
1 Like
The BMPT was released at 10.3-10.7 I forget which BR, that’s also why the booker was canceled cause it wasn’t 2023 standard and damn sure isn’t now, quite literally a waste of tax dollars
You added the rest of that paragraph so I’m not sure if you’re also saying that’s cope but not taking into the fact that aim 9Xs were made in the late 80s and we still haven’t seen that added( on aircraft) The US is stuck with 9Ms, France gets radar guided 50 G missiles, so there is no reason at all us aircraft shouldn’t have 9Xs which have way less range, and aim 9Xs get flared head on still.
It’s not American cope, the F15 was undefeated for 50 years and you get on war thunder and it makes you wonder “how was this plane 104-0” and they’re about to ruin the F14D now
But I understand why they make all the planes so underpowered, I’m 100% sure some government or entity has made deals with gaijin and that they want people to release classified docs, cause honestly that’s very smart, you don’t even need spys anymore to commit and risk their life joining a opposition military just to get info, you can just pay a video game company to destroy the morale of a country in a game to where they release classified info, just to improve the vehicle in game. I’ve seen what some of the devs look like (they look like they’d be at antifa riots throwing bricks at ICE and Police officers) so I absolutely believe they’d be foaming at the mouth to get money to have American/NATO docs released
5 Likes
M1128 then? Almost the same story. 2007 vehicle that can fight 1971 T-64A and sits at the same BR as 1985 Challenger 1 or T-72B1 and T-80B. You are moving the goalpost. First it was about BR and introduction date, now about only production and successful vehicles. What’s next?
You mean early 2000s? (IOC 2003)
Btw. MICA literally predates AIM-120D you have in game on american aircraft by almost 10 years…
2 Likes
I have stamped lobbies in all of the US tree planes I’ve played so far. Not far off of the A10 now
Sorry what ?
When the F15E dropped it just sat in LAO and dropped amraams on people who literally couldn’t respond.
The F15A while not better than gripen was still one of the best planes for its time as well.
The F16C again heavier than the A but was and is no slouch.
What are you on about 😒😂 also tbe iriaf dominated for ages and destroyed its entire BR range.
7 Likes
Battlefield and airspace control, logistics, tactics and lets face it, at times facing relatively inferior enemy or having massive advantage etc.
People who think that figure came solely from F-15 performance need to rethink their argument ;)
6 Likes
F-15I was and still is objectively better. Russian jets got R27ER when fighting the F-16. IRIAF was very strong for its BR but not the strongest top tier