Yeah, i’m on the wrong. I forgot C+ was Sealed and then with ECCM upgrade (during production) they just renamed it to ECCM/Sealed.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
One is export the other is a version made in the us for the us and was only used by the us
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Check this bro
Is armament you idoit.
Then you should fight for getting that in the Russian tree
Not giving the “he has icecream so I should also get icecream or I am setting the icecream van on fire” attitude
Your request is essentially based solely on the notion of “fair vs. unfair.”
So it’s a mirror image.
I want that dumb guy got band so much. He so anoying us.
This has gotten way off topic lmao
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
HA HA HA rigth. I think so.
True but according to cobra the US cant have a f14D becouse russia does not have a free su30 premium equivalent (su30m2) wen there is a much better su27sm to use
Its same situation as AIM-120 that test on F-14. I think who are idiot was you in this point. Base USSR PLA player in War Thunder. HA HA HA Cry harder.
Could VS. Did… The F14D COULD carry AIM 120’s and COULD carry AGM88A’s and COULD carry AIM 7P’s… The devs wont give the F14D any of those because there isnt PROOF, not Evidence, but PROOF that it carried them operationally and not just testing. So give us the PROOF the Yak did it and we will give it to you.
The problem everyone on the US side has is that everything we get needs definitive evidence that it was used operationally, not even just carried and thats what the Devs base it on. We are upset and feel there is bias because it seems sometimes the Russian Aircraft get things that are just on paper and not always real.
This appears to be a bug report rather than a suggestion. The AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed was historically used by the F-14D according to some sources, so if the missile is missing from the aircraft’s available loadouts, that would fall under historical implementation rather than a new suggestion.
There is already an accepted bug report covering this issue:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BkYSRNHHzkx1
As well as a duplicate report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UHDWCQSlI80k
I’d recommend supporting the existing bug report rather than submitting it as a suggestion.
Weapons are a balancing factor. That’s been said more than once.
Are you listening to yourself?
Apparently its not a balancing factor for the us