Where, then, is the exceedingly simple fix for M735?
This means the sources aren’t reliable. Google and Wikipedia are not good sources.
If the developers rejected it, it means they have a more reliable source.
Because the f14A-65-gr is a testing vehicle that test stuff for the f14 in general it tested if the f14 could carry and launch the amraam with digital tech and like I said I’m pretty sure it had the analog awg9 and not the digital apg71 witch is why I say it’s more of a f14B(u) upgrade expect f110 engines that it needs to fully use aim120 that the f14D has everything it needs to use aim120 not to mention the only f14D that was supposed to use aim120
1 Like
“could” This is just a guess. You need to obtain reliable information that the system has been tested and successfully integrated.
I’ve posted enough info for the f14D to come with AMRAAMs already
4 Likes
if you make aim 54 maneuverable like any other radar missile, then it’s Br will be treated same. wanna have only headon doppler at 13.0?
1 Like
would be actually good to have 13.3 yank premium as counterpart to 30mk instead of trashing 12.7
Your sources are not reliable and therefore cannot be accepted by the developer.
That’s what I’m saying the f14D w/aim120 could work at 13.3 and will go up when de compression happens
Bruh wtf are you on about their literally reports from the government them selfs that the devs already used to deny harms for f14 so their are reliable
1 Like
Nobody’s asked this but what’s your end goal? Why?
1 Like
Then what is the reason for the failure of the report you created for the developer?
Huh what report?
That didn’t take me to what your talking about and I never posted a report in that forums
Then your evidence doesn’t carry any weight. Because the developer is reviewing changes through this platform. Submit your data there, and we’ll get a response from the developer as to whether there’s enough evidence to support the introduction of aim120 for the f14D version.
Actually it should as last time I checked posting a thread here can also help with new introductions even without posting on their and plus if I do post a report on their then it should be accepted as they used the source themselves meaning they should be aware of the situation of f14D w/amraams
You’re right. I could just not buy it. But then who’s the plane being added for if not for the people that have been requesting it since the Danger Zone update? Even the base logic doesn’t make sense from a player perspective.
“Look guys, you see this Final ‘Super’ variant of this aircraft that everyone’s requesting? We’re gonna add it, with no REAL F14D capabilities, and then make it a premium, so those people who want it have to buy it. Great idea right???” — Gaijin probably
8 Likes
Like all the other premiums, which are essentially clones. You also posted in the F16AM thread about your dissatisfaction with the introduction of prem clone?