This would make a lot of Poles angry for sure, Poland has a lot of cool vehicles, it could have its own tech tree, and then gaijin could add things like Slovakia to Poland or Romania, But I still want Ukraine to be part of the Soviet Union tree, not just Ukraine, like Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc.
However, it would be better to add this separation, otherwise the War Thunder forum and the review bombs would catch fire.
Well, I don’t think so, and I stand by my words and opinion.
I believe that anytime we get sub-tree suggestion, the primary and main right to vote belong to citizens from “sub-tree” in question (e.g. Thai when Thai sub-tree, Swiss when Swiss sub-tree, Belgians/Dutch/Luxembourgers when BeNeLux sub-tree), and as being one, I oppose this suggestion.
It’s either entirety coming or nothing. This suggestion is even worse than Australia/Canada/Poland nation representation whereas these nations have no defined tt and are shared across several other established nations.
1 Like
Great idea bro, just remember the game is owned by gaijin and we don’t live in a fairy tale
As I said, I believe, not it does
But again, as I stated back in UA TT suggestion, were devs wanting UA to be represented in any form, they would do that well before 2022, but doing that right now, and in the form you suggest…
Things wouldn’t be that easy, it wouldn’t be like electing a class leader at school
You’d have whining and crying no matter how they implement it.
they could add it as is and you wouldn’t see a difference, everyone has different ideas.
Well with recent posts of the devs, it seems they are willing to do anything the community does not want.
I personally think with the mindset of gaijin, a pre-2014 ukraine to USSR would be the best chance.
We could also suppor this with other SSRs, instead of USSR ingame just being glorified Russian empire
They weren’t for the matter of fact. UA proposals were around WT forums since 2018 I believe, and so far none entered in form of UA vehicle being placed somehwere, exept via implications, aka BM Oplot-T
War Thunder has been growing too fast since 2023 in my opinion, maybe that’s why there was no idea of subtrees like Ukraine in 2021
Some people rumour that devs planned UA to become sub-tree for USSR in summer 2022, but as you can see…
And, well, iirc officials also replied that there was no such intention [to add UA to USSR], but I’d mostly believe it, not entirely.
It really wouldnt matter what the devs did to add it, there would still be a lot of problems
1 Like
As with any addition XD
I’m in favor with domestic stuff anyway, they’ll fit in the current tree just fine. and with how BVV_d talked about the BM Oplot on the dev stream it has me kinda excited because it sounds like its a plan in the future.
Now, I would sort of agree with this statement, and to not repeat myself, I’ll leave a link to this subject:
1 Like
Gaijin is consistent in that they’re inconsistent how they chose to do it. Think India. That would rather have a place as a USSR subtree than anywhere else, but what about british imperial period equipment? That certainly would be better in the UK.
Sometimes feels it would be best if they didn’t add some nations like India at all because of all the fuss it brings. Or even Ukraine in this case.
Agree, and the worst thing being it touches all aspects of game, not just nations/vehicles.
Yes and no.
Yes because it hurts ones eye when looking at Eastern tech side by side Western tech when it comes to a nation scale (even though Indian tanks were based on both Eastern tech, e.g. T-72/90, and Western, e.g. Leopard 2).
No because chopping nations means less possibilities for nation-specific lineups (subjective opinion) and generally disables some nations from variable vehicle possibilities. Yeah, maybe having Indian T-90S in the USSR tt and keeping something like Arjun around UK/Germany is a fine concept, but seeing a civil war whereas Indian T-90S and MiG-21 Bison on USSR side fight Indian Arjun and HAL Tejas on UK/German side ruins those leftovers of logic in the game.
Nah. Imho India is a great option for the UK as sub-tree, as it brings different flavor to the top-tier and possibility to avoid copy paste only (sadly Gaijin doesn’t think so), namely via Arjun-series tanks.
I am also not completely against UA being sub-tree to USSR tt, as UA boasts unique and interesting designs as well.
What I despise in both cases tho is Gaijin’s approach to additions. They rather bring copy paste slop as researchable option(s) and unique designs locked behind paywall/limited time events. Was it not such approach, Indian and BeNeLux sub-trees would have been perceived in a much more positive way, but here we are.
1 Like
No one would say a word if they would add it as a part of Polish tech tree. Definetly not rusia though.
There would be some
God damn it, you made it look like a meme with your nickname.
On the other hand it could be just enough to justify separate Polish tech tree, which is good.
That is a fact though, modern relation ships are alright but the past is rather complicated.
Also our tech tree can stand alone very easily, Ukraine would not contribute much