isnt sky sword 15kms? Personally i think its too small of a range compared to the buk or sampt ngl. On par with tan sam kai?
Unless im missing something
Naw that’s way better than the tan sam. That thing is just sad.
fk-1000/2000 is Pantsir equal system, no longer a good choice.
LY-70 is ARH SLM equal but with additional FB-10A attached.
KS-1A/HQ-12 and HQ-22 is not so suitable for game for their low ammo storage.
HQ-11 is also a ARH SLM equal, with basically larger version of TOR’s missile.
BUK equal is HQ-16/LY-80, not sure if the latest version has ARH seeker
I’d compare HQ-11 to S-350 with base 9M96, its pretty similar
not very comparable imo, HQ-11/FM-3000 is still basically a larger TOR/9M331
some new SPAA choices
4 Likes
1 Like
i dream of m1a2t
1 Like
Model of current plan displayed in TADTE. Programme is now in cooperation with Leonardo DRS.
Aluminum alloy turret spaced armours. Auxiliary power unit in the bustle rack. Electrical turret drive. New gunner’s sight. Commander’s independent sight is also a remote weapon station. 'May adopt a variant of the 105mm used by the new wheeled mobile gun for compatibility with the latter’s newly-developed ammunitions.
One of the design focuses is to minimize weight growth since no modification is to be done to the hull.
2 Likes
I am interpreting the word “potential” VERY loosely with this one because while a prototype was built, practicality is a different story. I have not a clue what possessed me into posting this here.
After the Delco LAV-25 turret was deemed too expensive for the CM34 IFV project, an attempt was made by the Combined Logistics Command in 2009 to adapt the 20mm T75, itself adapted from the M39 aircraft revolver cannon, into a turret. The turret is driven by electrical motors and stabilized on two axis’s. The 20mm cannon, a co-axial 7.62mm T74 machinegun, and the gunner’s sights are mounted in a compartment separated from the crew and elevate/depress together- while this arrangement is modular and ensures that the fumes from the T75 cannon firing would not enter the turret interior, it also means that the crew cannot troubleshoot the cannon in any way without exiting the vehicle. Having to accommodate the downward spent shell ejection of the T75 cannon made the turret too tall as well. The deficiency in firepower isn’t lost on those working on the turret, who planned to adopt the cannon to chamber and fire the Mk 244 Mod 0 APDS ammunition that is already being imported for ROCN’s Phalanx CIWS. The barrel life of the T75 cannon is also deemed unsatisfactory for IFV use (the ROCA stipulated 8000 rounds), and all of the afore-mentioned issues meant that getting the turret to a serviceable form would provide no advantage in cost or time over what the ROCA would consider the definitive requirement, which by the end of 2010 had become a 30mm cannon and almost certainly for the 30×173mm cartridge. The developer thus moved on to eventually what we see on the production CM34.
To further illustrate the above:
3 Likes
VN-20’s AUS1 turret
To be honest. Gaijin will either add NONE of these or just add it and artificially nerf it to the ground. Just give up on the Chinese tree already. It isn’t worth the effort
1 Like
They should also add clouded leopard II with both the autocannon and the 105mm turret options
1 Like
3 Likes
Do you know what the height of this car is?