Potential Chinese Ground Force Additions

clearly, you don’t understand the situation, still keep the idea of “Pantsir being the best” and asking for a Pantsir equivalent while Pantsir already can’t fit the situation for long time

1 Like

image
Here’s the side profile for you

3 Likes

why no one took any pictures from front?

makesweet-s3xw39

Pantsir is still a very competitive SPAA

1 Like

seems there is a isolated cabin

2 Likes

Nice. IDK still need to see what’s in there. Could be a vertical launch thing, probably UAV as much as ATGM.

Should be modular, compatible to ATGM, Loitering Munition or UAV
CM-501 is an example of this kind of VLS launcher

taiwan magach is real

1 Like

Gaijin adds yet another great SPAA to Russia while ignoring demands for a reasonably good SPAA in the Chinese tree. I don’t oppose good SPAAs to be added to some nations but every nation should at least have a useable SPAA

3 Likes

China is far from not having “usable SPAA” (unless you’re talking about nations, like Sweden, but it’s a bit weird to talk about here)

1 Like

FK-2000 would be better

what are chinas options for longer ranged top tier anti air?
FK1000/2000, LY70, KS-1A ?

like, 3 minutes of google gives me this for the PRC

The ROC has this

HQ-16, no point in getting anything with less than 50km range

HQ-22 or HQ-16C is probably the best option. HQ-22 should be comparable to Aster 30

Personally I’d say Bee Eye w/ sky sword II. Seems somewhat more balanced than 170KM, & it comes in TEL launchers.

3 Likes

Actually I meant the export version of HQ-22 which only has 100km range

isnt sky sword 15kms? Personally i think its too small of a range compared to the buk or sampt ngl. On par with tan sam kai?

Unless im missing something

Naw that’s way better than the tan sam. That thing is just sad.