FK-1000 and eventually FK-2000 are more useful additions compared to FK-3000 imo. FK-3000 is more intended to destroy UAVs and small drones.
Yep
No problem. If the FK-3000/L really has 12KM range, it could still make an insanely good SPAA in the game with its 96 ammo.
but not very suitable, I guess this 12km missile will act more like the missile of 2s6, loosing mobility quickly, only good at intercepting agm/bombs and drones
A little off topic. Do you think these should go into the Chinese Tech Tree or the country that made the modifications?
GIAT T59, The AMX 30 in a chinese tank
Marksman Type 59
Is FK3000 missile related to FL3000N? Both have similar shape and size
no, the big missile is the same as FK-2000, something like 95ya6, the smaller 12km one, I don’t know what it looks like, the super small one, is a smaller manpad.
same “3000” is just a coincidence, they are not related
I was talking about the smaller one. It seems there was a FK3000 sam in the background of this picture.
it seems to be a different vehicle
Better solution is to give both TT the same vehicle like the Ram II
you are right. Missile ranges are different as well. Maybe this was the initial design of FK3000
Country that initiated the modifications for sure. While they are export vehicles never intended for service with the parent nations that birthed them, they were also never intended for any one nation, nor accepted into service with anybody.
So therefore, it would make sense to add the GIAT T-59 as an event or perhaps even squadron vehicle for France, and the T-59 Marksman as a foldered SPAA in the British tree (although at the moment there really isn’t any need for another Marksman).
According to this article china had few IS-3?
DOn’t think so. It says a small lot, likely for tests.
Good enough for Gaijin
True
Probably misidentified WZ111
I don’t think they did, cause it doesn’t even have a turret, I think it is pretty blur about this indicating some sort of test or just joint exercise and they had a look.