Potential additions of T-55A & T-62 Obr. 1974

As the title suggests, I’d like to bring these up for discussion as how they would fit into the USSR Tech Tree, specifically T-55A Obr. 1974 & T-62 Obr. 1974. These tanks are later modifications of the initial production variants; T-62 (1962 as present without a roof HMG) and T-55A (Obr. 1970 as present with an HMG).

They feature a new KTD-1 laser rangefinder, this can be found also on T-55AM-1, T-55AMD and T-62M-1, new radio equipment which would not be relevant. These tanks also retain the same locomotive performance and engine (V-55) and as the former and do not use the “Tochka” smoke launcher array they also don’t have the applique armor fitted onto them.

Ideally this would be put at 8.7-9.0 when the latter vehicles would receive some decompression as they are pretty evil in frequent down tiers when the major 10.3 MBTs were moved to 10.7.

Screenshot 2026-07-09 235234

2 Likes

As other people remember T-55AM-1 was very, very oppressive when it was 8.7, so I wouldn’t want to make the mistake of putting too low.

1 Like

Updated with example image

Why move the T-72A to rank 7? Its 9.3, the rest of its 9.3 lineup is rank 6, 9.3’s in general are rank 6.

Folders can have more than 2 vehicles, there’s more than enough room in rank 6

Because in the future, when we get BR decompression, it will be moved up to 9.7, and it also can get ERA.

Decompression moving everything at 9.3 upwards doesn’t really change the relative spread, all the 9.3 lineups just become 9.7 lineups.

Still awkward when the now 9.7 lineup is rank 6, except the one tank the T-72A which is rank 7.

Kontakt-1, its deadweight

That’s how it was when T-64B was 9.7 before it was uptiered last year

HOT and I-TOWs…

And it was awkward then

Rank 6 also currently has a pretty reasonable BR spread for MBTs, 8.3-9.3. Where moving to rank 7 the spread is now 9.3-12.0, or 9.7-12.3 after decompression.

Especially when a lot of the currently missing rank 7 tanks get added, rank 7 will get pretty crowded

Really don’t see that many, the vast majority of encounters are longrod APFSDS which don’t care about K1

Better to have the weight saving

There is a large strength disparity between Soviet 8.7-9.0 and 9.3 tanks, that is my wish to close the gap.

How would it be crowded if I’m I have T-72B3 and T-90A foddered in the proposal?

M901 and MEPHISTO are not pretty common aren’t they?

And T-72B folder would be moved after T-72A as I forgot to mark it.

Even bigger gap between the T-72A and T-80U-E1

Lot of missing rank 7 tanks, when those get added

Not especially, don’t remember the last time I ran into one in a T-72A

I think people understand what you meant

That’s a 12.0 premium, this should not be used to prove a point when we know that most of these premiums above 11.3-11.7 don’t belong in Rank VII.

We’ll see when that happens.

Idk I feel like I see them all the time along with AFT-09 and ZTA-03 but those have tandem warheads.

I think in some point in the future someone else would miss it and ask about it anyway.

And Ngl T-80U should be 11.0 or 11.3 with the removal of the experimental AGAVA-2 thermals and 3BM-46

Next tech tree down is 11.7, so the spread is 9.3-11.7, or 9.7-12.0 after decompression.

Still pretty crowded in one rank.

Nah, they can add a separate early version without them, the current T-80U is a critical part of the top tier lineup unless you pay $60 USD for the T-80UE-1

It would be interesting to give many Soviet tanks their real ammunition, and thus separate and add several tanks. For example, remove the APDS and HEAT rounds from the T-54 (lowering its BR slightly) and add the T-54A with HEAT instead. Remove the 3BM25 from the T-55A and add the T-55AM (with laser) with the 3BM20, and keep the 3BM25 with its corrected penetration for the T-55AMD and AM1. Leave the T-62 as it is and add the T-62 (1975, which has a laser) with the 3BM21 as its best ammunition. I also would have liked the T-72B to have been given the composite armor of the early models and to leave the T-72B (1989) as it is now in the game.

Wait where?

Why would 12.0s stay in Rank VII when eventually Rank X comes into the game?

Sure.

T-80U, 11.7 rank 7

We’ve still got rank 9 to get to before talking about rank 10. And rank 8 is still pretty empty so I don’t think we’ll be seeing new ranks in ground for a while.

3BM-32 and other Soviet DU ammo vibes

They do suck pretty bad at 8.0 but removing the ammo is iffy IMO.

Sure

Wdym?

There’s an even earlier model with 60-15-15-15-50 UFP armour and another with 60-10-10-20-20-50

Not the biggest practical difference in protection to the ingame model

1 Like

Yes, they can be added to the corresponding model. I mainly mean that, for example, a tank from 1951 can use ammunition from 1947, 1950, or 1952, but not ammunition from 1955 or 1960.

I used all three (four if you count the Titan 4) and I found them to be quite competent tanks, not spectacular but quite good in their Br.

I don’t really know how that armor would work. It would clearly be inferior to the final T-72B models, but it would be interesting to see what kind of protection they would give it in the game, with so many layers of steel and air.