Possible Yugoslavia sub-tree for USSR


With the latest leak it appears the USSR might be getting the M-55S.

Czechoslovakia has already been confirmed not be a sub-tree for USSR

Keep in mind Germany, a major nation with 5 lines has gotten a Swiss sub-tree. This means there is no real reason USSR couldn’t be getting a sub-tree in the future, and Yugoslavia could be a good option.

Here are some things that could be added.
fdaa5f9b193f4e25a21a1cc0e01b1278
Degman_06_v





dd4e309271993a1132b163b4d55c542ee16530d5_2_500x333
serbian-ifv-lazanski-v0-aj79qf1ocztb1
Serbian_defense_industry_has_developed_M-84AS2_upgrade_version_of_M-84_tank_925_001
images (28)
image
DCeWS4A
Jakob-Lotz-Stuart-PaK40-a
t34-34

4 Likes

Screenshot_20250831-072449_1

Lmao.

9 Likes

A bit of history on Goli Otok aka Croatian Alcatraz.
I think YU fits more alongside CZ-SK vehicles.

In 1949, the entire island was officially made into a high-security, top secret prison and labor camp set up by the authorities of the People’s Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,[6] together with the nearby Sveti Grgur island, which held a similar camp for female prisoners. Until 1956, following the Tito–Stalin split and throughout the Informbiro period, it was used to incarcerate political prisoners. These included known and alleged Stalinists, but also other Communist Party of Yugoslavia members or even non-party citizens accused of exhibiting sympathy or leanings towards the Soviet Union.

That said, I don’t think ex-members of YU (excluding maybe Croatia and Slovenia) have anything against USSR or RU as of right now.

1 Like

i am against it

ussr needs no subtrees

5 Likes

just say that you want NATO vehicles in the russian TT

6 Likes

I’d want a Croatian Rafale alongside 30SM.

1 Like

better yet, lets get rid of all nations and combine it into one big TT

3 Likes

Lets rename that tree to WORLD

2 Likes

That’s actually not so bad of a concept if you think about it.

I wouldn’t really mind considering the direction of this game and how many copy paste slop labeled as “new content” we’re getting.

2 Likes

Pair that with the fact mixed battles are already happening, especially in higher tiers of air, so we are pretty much used to the “everyone vs everyone” concept.

1 Like

I think Rafale for USSR would be pretty balanced.

1 Like

If more unique Yugoslavian vehicles, YES. But if it’s more copy paste vehicles, NO.

1 Like

Already said this in RRD, but I wouldnt have a Yugo sub TT in Russia. Not only were relationships not good (especially after WW2), but many, many Yugo players just want it to be its own tree, as it has enough.

Only times Ive seen them want it there is because they got good amount of the Russian TT grinded

Russia could just get things it had back then, like Belarus

9 Likes

Nah Russia can take Ukraine’s MBTs like the T-84 the upgraded version of Soviet T-80

3 Likes

If the USSR has to get a sub, I’d rather they get a nation that couldn’t form a tree by themselves.

Yugoslavia + Successors are literally the strongest case for a new tree

5 Likes

If it means not having to research the umpteenth M44, I’m in favour

1 Like

Not that’s strong, it’s the one of the main competitors for the next tech tree in-game, so was Benelux and look how they messed that up

1 Like

And there is no reason to start worrying if this a sub tree,same thing is going to probably happen to it like with Czeckoslovakia, it won’t be a sub tree

1 Like

In my opinion, the most realistic option would be to add Ukraine as a sub tree instead of Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia.

3 Likes