Btw, is a 2nd one possible?
Aka, Schakal (Puma VJTF Turret on Boxer Hull) or unlikely as it would be just another 10 7 one?
No plans for this spesific one now. It doesn’t really bring anything to the tree that the current one doesn’t already.
1 Like
I mean, would offer a IRCM on top + a Unmanned turret :3
And it would Boost the 10.7 Lineup :D
(Need for Spike Slinger)
Zusammenfassung
Issue with that:
Would need a Dev to make the MUSS One system and not a gazillion versions because he (copied) the Pre 1st Rework one which wont work as Intended
Maybe a 10.0/10.3 one?
(Same Hull/Turret but no Spikes/MUSS, aka its a Puma S0 Turret)
“doesnt bring anything to the tree that the current one doesnt already”
1 Like
I do disagree with that statement there because the Schakal has a few things the sWaTrgInf does not have and there are a few features that make it stand out, Like for example a Unmanned turret that only the Vilkas possesses (which is a Event vehicle so not exactly accessable for everyone), plus an adjustable Spike Launcher similarly to the Puma VJTF plus a IRCM and lastly the Anti Drone Package which has a small radar (though idk if that part can be implemented).
Brings peakness and muss 2.0 if they picked a modern prototype. Plus Germany can always do with more tanks at that rank :3
They could give us a l44 version or AWISS 🤷♀️
Or an actual leopard between 10.7 and 12.3
Tbf there’s not many options because they are very good lmao.
2A4 was still used when DM33 entered service in 1987 as the 2A5 came 8 years later in 95. Another late version of 2A4 could be added with a better shell and armor.
Theres also 2A4 with 140mm cannon prototype. There is also a 2A4 wíth APS (AWiSS) which given that we already had T72B3 Arena and such would not be that far fetched to put it at 11.0 or 11.3.
Also 2A4 with ERA.
Theres loads of leopards we could have, but instead germany has one single MBT between 10.7 and 12.3 if were not counting an 80 euro premium
1 Like
Both more event material.
That’s literally addon weight to test 2a5s cheeks lmao.
You missed the main part there. A C tech leopard. You could add dm53 to our current 2a4 and you wouldn’t be far off since that’s what swiss 2a4s used
ah my bad, reading comprehension be like.
at some point the tech tree needs something else than just events.
a higher protection leopard with just DM33 for either 11.3 or 11.7 like M1A1 would be fine.
Too bad that’s exactly what the vehicle likely would be lmao. Again see most lower tier APS vehicles - event and all high caliber guns - 292 event
Probably closer to dm43 if you want a m1a1 competitor. But almost all of the Abrams family are horribly undertiered.
the point is more a 2A4 as a bridge between 2A4 and 2A5, think 2A4 (Late). Thats currently the issue. They took 2PL away from 11.7, gave it better shell and put it at the same BR as 2A5. Genuinely could have stayed where it was. Instead theres a void.
I dont need M1A1 competitor, i need something like the IPM1 or M1A1 between M1 and M1A2.
i mean, just cuz it was before doesnt mean it has to be now. But either way, something should just be added in.
8 hours working 8 hours sleep, 1 hour cooking and doing other things on the house, yeak almost no time for people with jobs lol
Your reply states that you don’t add vehicles that you deem “too unique” because people might complain that they don’t get access to them, to which I have stated like half a dozen vehicles that are unique or would have been a good addition to the tech tree.
And yes, I do know that the discount puma exists. Just that it’s basically inrrelevant because it’s a spike-autoocannon vehicle that are arguably useless. Unlike the one with the 105mm cannon.
Oh, you mean the BMD with the >>>>>>>>>>13 second ATGM reload<<<<<<<<<<<<< that the event and tech tree don’t have, making it a sidegrade to the BMP3???
The constant enshitification of the game really makes me wish we could go back on some of the changes we came to as a community, they were the right choice at the time but gaijin had to ruin it somehow…
1 Like