@EddieVanHalo
Ah yes, took you long enough to defend Gaijin by having a post claiming War Thunder’s critics are employees.
Oh, and your post is implying those that acknowledge the copy-paste are all employees.
So according to your post, people are not an employee if they ignore the copy paste and never criticize War Thunder.
They’re good at complaining 24/7.
There are vehicles that are trash and need fixing in the Jap TT, however they’ll never get fixed bc Japan mains complain about literally every vehicle
Criticizing warthunder what? I called Pangolin toxic since all he ever does is complain about different nation players and that they are op. You didn’t even read what i put down lmao
Next time you should read Alvis my posts more closely though i guess youll just formulate some nonsense that has no correlation
When all of his posts are toxic its not the posts its the person being toxic.
@Pheonix_RX01
Also, call their posts toxic not the person.
It’s far more civil to address posts over players.
Also, everyone’s reading your posts.
Had to re-post cause Phoenix decided to post insults instead of having civil discussion in their post, and I don’t directly reply to insults.
I agree Alvis is either a Gaijin stooly or a self appointed defender of the faith trying to be teachers pet.
We all have a love for this game and our criticisms are only to make it better.
If Gaijin have to fill gaps with copy past then why not add better decals and individual exterior items and at least make an effort.
As Zen said,why not put the muzzle flash eliminator on the T34 , why not logs and tools on the Panzer IV, just something,anything.It’s lame.
Oh well, looks like people cant use basic context clues to understand i was referring to you.
Though most people will see this and go
i am reading allat
Noooooooooo how can you read all of that and disprove my point, now my argument is invalid nooooooooo
Lmao
@EddieVanHalo Sir, he’s not talking about me.
And now you’re claiming you’re a Gaijin pet…
Why? Why do you seemingly hate everyone that criticizes War Thunder?
Why do you claim to agree with me about criticizing War Thunder when you say everyone that criticizes War Thunder are defending War Thunder?
*replacing the coax MG with a soviet one, take the around-turret spaced armor off, and downtier it by .3
Talking to you is like talking to a child, you can try to have a civil discussion but they dont listen, thats you. You try to act as this knight that can do no wrong but it just comes off as kinda sad. You dont actually accept anything others say, the general idea of copy and paste is similar model and similar equipment. If the vehicle has a different gun and a unique model with major differences most would consider that to be “new” but not always. T55M is a new model with a new round but in the end its a T55A with a better apfsds at the same br as a much better T55 with armor on the turret, more ammo options and a better engine. Yeah id call the T55M a copy paste. Its just a t55a with some.boxs and one new round.
Your definition is if the vehicle has a scratch on the front its a new vehicle.
Oh boy i cant wait for him to read this and disregard it entirely and go off on some other tangent.
Unfortunately for the others there isnt a lot we can do, but the finnish T-50 would fill the T-28 to T-34 hole, and we could folder the T-34-85 under the Kwk 40-armed T-34. Correcting the finnish T-28 would also be nice.
T-55M is fine tbh, but I would rather it have been the T-55MK (A commander variant of the T-55 that was modernized by the finns)
T34-75 would be like 5.0 imo maybe lower but 5.0 would be kinda rough with the armor it has without a better gun.
Id rather it not be a t55a at 8.7 thats what it is. Its not equal to the T55 AM 1
I will come in with a Japanese stereotype and say that nearly every time I see some body with a Japanese name they are kicking ass big time and near the top of the leader-board.I look to see if and how they were cheating on the replay from a number of views and just see that they were simply playing a fine game and had done their homework on where to move and where to shoot.
I find the same with Chinese names ,I apologise if I cant tell Chinese from Korean etc )
All I can do is see the names in Japanese of who I am playing against and up my game a bit.If its a squad I know I am in trouble.That is just experience and they don’t have much of a line do they really? I don’t think anybody can accuse the Japanese of being traditional complainers either in the game or outside of it : )
Japan is solid, 6.7 is kinda meh and below 2.7 is rough but its pretty good, just lacks lineups
The gun isnt half bad, given its a L/48- though at 5.0 it would be awesome alongside the DT. The T-55M is fine at 8.7 due to M1000A1, which is far better then early soviet APFSDS.
They literally try to say the F-104 is OP, but the T-2 is overtiered XD
