“Visual differences and mechanical differences doesn’t make vehicles unique.” - Someone that indirectly argues the P-51D and P-51C are copy-paste of each other.
Let’s see.
Unique vehicles not in other tech trees for the 3.7 lineup:
Sherman III/IV [M4A2 is not this tank], Pvkv IV, Pvkv III.
Copy-paste: Panzer IV.
4.0 is even less copy-paste relative to the amount of tanks.
I called the T-34s copy-paste, so my assessment of the T-34s are wrong to you?
I mean we dont get a choice, and finland takes one look to see gaijin will keep that mindest forever. Why is the KV a prem. Why is the patria a event, why is the entire air line prem. They had the audacity to make anything finnish event/prem which is why its such a worthless sub nation.
@EddieVanHalo
Ah yes, took you long enough to defend Gaijin by having a post claiming War Thunder’s critics are employees.
Oh, and your post is implying those that acknowledge the copy-paste are all employees.
So according to your post, people are not an employee if they ignore the copy paste and never criticize War Thunder.
Criticizing warthunder what? I called Pangolin toxic since all he ever does is complain about different nation players and that they are op. You didn’t even read what i put down lmao
Next time you should read Alvis my posts more closely though i guess youll just formulate some nonsense that has no correlation
I agree Alvis is either a Gaijin stooly or a self appointed defender of the faith trying to be teachers pet.
We all have a love for this game and our criticisms are only to make it better.
If Gaijin have to fill gaps with copy past then why not add better decals and individual exterior items and at least make an effort.
As Zen said,why not put the muzzle flash eliminator on the T34 , why not logs and tools on the Panzer IV, just something,anything.It’s lame.
@EddieVanHalo Sir, he’s not talking about me.
And now you’re claiming you’re a Gaijin pet…
Why? Why do you seemingly hate everyone that criticizes War Thunder?
Why do you claim to agree with me about criticizing War Thunder when you say everyone that criticizes War Thunder are defending War Thunder?
Talking to you is like talking to a child, you can try to have a civil discussion but they dont listen, thats you. You try to act as this knight that can do no wrong but it just comes off as kinda sad. You dont actually accept anything others say, the general idea of copy and paste is similar model and similar equipment. If the vehicle has a different gun and a unique model with major differences most would consider that to be “new” but not always. T55M is a new model with a new round but in the end its a T55A with a better apfsds at the same br as a much better T55 with armor on the turret, more ammo options and a better engine. Yeah id call the T55M a copy paste. Its just a t55a with some.boxs and one new round.
Your definition is if the vehicle has a scratch on the front its a new vehicle.
Oh boy i cant wait for him to read this and disregard it entirely and go off on some other tangent.
Unfortunately for the others there isnt a lot we can do, but the finnish T-50 would fill the T-28 to T-34 hole, and we could folder the T-34-85 under the Kwk 40-armed T-34. Correcting the finnish T-28 would also be nice.
