how bad that the 29 is horrifically bad acceleration due to its unrealistic static drag.
And no, speed advantage in top tier is going into the battle.
ive just explained 3 FUCKING CONSECUTIVE TIMES THAT YOU WONT BOOM AND ZOOM A MACH 3 MISSILE DAWG.
It explains why it’s 2:1 when using it in its spaded state.
It was used exclusively as a bomber until it was performance spaded and it only had access to 2x AIM-120s until it was pretty much spaded cause the modules order is cooked with that aircraft. And even when using it as a bomber I still did better than I thought.
There were 6ish crashes due to compression, and the rest were losses to dogfights because teams collapsed before my bombs were off.
Better FM than F-14, F-18 and arguably on par or better than M2k because it compresses much less and accelerates faster. It’s at least average for the BR
It’s effectively one of the best radar kits for 12.7, only surpassed by the Yak141.
a mig29 limited to only 4 R73s and 27Rs would be a case of asymmetrical balance compared to the mirage as the 29 would get 2 more missiles, while the mirage would have; almost triple the amount of countermeasures, much better avionics and much better flight model.
@Merf_HD
So we agree that the thrust curve on Mig-29 is incorrect. Good.
Negative? The only aircraft I get near negative on are bombers for spading, because bombing takes time and is inherently more dangerous.
F-14A: 2:1.
F-14B: 1.7:1.
F-15J: 1.5:1.
F-15JM: 1.5:1.
F-16AJ: 2:1.
F-2A: 2:1.
F-4EJ Kai: 2:1.
F-18C Late: 1.9:1.
Mig-29 9.12: 2:1.
Mig-29G: 1.9:1.
I do not and will never know how to be the best fighter pilot, nor do I care to.
Defyn is a better source of knowledge in that regard.
F-18 is too slow after mach1, and bleeds too much speed on top of that. Mig-29 goes 1500kph on the deck, and it’s not much worse in turning or energy retention.
Mig-29 is a better FM for the meta. Not everything is about merging 1v1 duels