Please Give Us Back the Original Panther II, Flakpanzer 341 "Coelian," and Tiger II 10.5cm KwK

So since they added the fake Radkampfwagen, F-16J, Kronstadt etc, the 3 German Tanks can be re-added.

1 Like

Radkampfwagen was real, it’s in a museum.
Kronstadt is real, it was laid down [which is the rule for naval vessels].
And for F-16AJ:

2 Likes

That’s why the Maus was removed?

He isn’t even saying the vehicles are better; plus, find me accurate, detailed blueprints of the Tiger II 105 and Panther II.

And again, they weren’t built. They aren’t real. They don’t exist. They are fictional in their entirety. If I draw on some paper dimensions and designs for a new Abrams, can we have that in game? Blueprints exist, even though it was never built. Well, aside from the tracks, since I’ll be using the same tracks on the Abrams I make as the old ones.

What Alvis said. Can’t say it better myself. Also, Naval has different rules because of a lack of content, unlike Ground and Air.

My point in case. It’s an active avoidance where possible; and it’s very possible here because Germany has a lot of other real tanks it can add. Those real tanks not being the Tiger II 10.5 or Panther II or Koelian, because they were never built and are not real.

Didn’t know that the RKpW 90 was fake…

1 Like

That also does not look like 105mm, rather 88mm

1 Like

Is a placeholder because they couldn’t add the Mitz F-2 yet.

The hull was built, which is enough to get it added, as they both stated Naval additions are different from ground because of how limited it is.

1 Like

No guys that’s a hologram it isn’t real I swear now give me the tanks

lol, I feel like this guy keeps either BS-ing us up and down because he thinks we ride the sped-sled, or he genuinely thinks he’s right.

Regardless, there is a problem there lol

1 Like

Wasn’t the turret on RKpW a mockup?

1 Like

Technically speaking; I don’t think so, it’s the Leo 2k turret w/o the RH202 for commander. To be completely fair, the early Leo 2k turret didn’t even have a RH202, only on the last version, so it’s highly likely it worked.

1 Like

If you are an engineer during an active war, sure.

1 Like

Oh, the Cold War was active, didn’t know that, seems the Abram’s needs to be removed, hell, all modern tanks by that standard.

To be fair, there is almost always an active war somewhere on this earth. Be a part or not.

1 Like

This is the only remote real world documentation of it I have…
image

There’s almost none, or none surviving because it was a private venture by RHM and Daimler.

1 Like

I am very devoted to the cause. Just check my latest Video on my YT Channel

This graphic also breaths light to another RKpW variant…

@Mahiwew

2 Likes

F-2 wouldn’t get the F-16AJ removed as it wouldn’t be 12.0.
F-16AJ needs F-16A OCU from Thailand to be delisted.

1 Like

You’ve done this a million times. You aren’t getting what you want and are diluting the forum with post after post requesting it even though we have an answer.

You are an active troll, as I remember I had this conversation a long while back with you and it didn’t work for the same reasons- stubbornness and blind idiocy. Also, xenophobia and racism, which conveniently you were suspended from the forums for.

If you want an actual conversation about these vehicles, go to WoT. Otherwise, stop trying to fight for a lost cause here.