Bingo.
Remember when the m1 was dropped and the match maker had to be changed so uptiers were limited to 4 vehicles😂
1 Like
The module doesn’t need an HP system because War Thunder is built on realistic damage. In real life, a single hit to something like a breech or turret ring can knock it out completely — it’s not supposed to soak damage.
The long repair time might seem harsh… 20 seconds should be enough, but it forces players to think tactically.
the module do soak spall
i analyze the detail and see the basket soak the spall on first cone partially
but it all come down to second cone which you can clearly see create one
which turret baskey shouldnt create spall
it do both thing
eat partially
and create more
but it create more than eat it
and irl it shouldnt have enough thickness to create shrapnel
which i literally gave proof and you try to denied it
sling some rounds? thats literally the average M1 hull shot
do i need to use 3bm42?
thats normal for the abrams pre turret baskets lol
All modules in this game use HP mate… maybe learn how the game works before posting
Everything in WT is based on HP and damage, its just not displayed in numbers but colours… Every module in the game has HP, ever crew has HP, every shell has damage every piece of shrapnle has damage.
or just make it that it doesnt create more spall and doesnt cripple the whole tank upon shot duh
make it black out and slow down or sth
i mean its basically what RU autoloader is
IDK mate, but have you heard of using your hull?
That’ll be the sump pump being hit crippling the turret drive.
It’s blatantly wrong, but the bugs go unfixed sadly.
No offense, but I know you and I can say for certain you have some of the worst takes ever. APCR being the best training shell for APDS/APFSDS? Yeah right. Rage bait used to be believable.
Sometimes your perspectives are just plain wrong.
“troll”
Yeah bud you replied to my thread about me requesting the M48 reload to be shorter, and you said APCR was your go-to on the T26E5, and you said, quote,
“APCR is the best training round. It forces you to learn”
You also entirely failed to reply to my counter of “APDS and APFSDS are entirely different shells with entirely different performances”
Now you’re writing me off as a troll, how rich.
The abrams is OK. I’m not the best, infact I am quite buns sometimes, however I can consistently get 3-7 kills a match if my adhd doesn’t funnel me down to the capture point everyone goes to. The Abrams is OK for good players, everyone saying “Abrams should get 9,000mm KE hull” (exaggerated) take all the seriousness out of these discussions. I feel like though, the turret basket was unnecessary, and everytime I get hit the turret can’t turn aswell. The basket is just there to put the nail in the coffin, since even if my commander overrides, the turret can’t be turned, if I get shot in the LFP, its either my driver or my engine dies. The turret ring is also not volumetric apparently (I know nothing about the turret ring) and there is no M829A3. I’d be willing to give up the 5s reload for a better shell or just something to make the Abrams feel like an Abrams.
Your name is intentionally provocative, and your posts contain intentionally false accusations as a way to provoke others.
Intentional provocation is what trolling is.
And yes, a harder to use thing is better for training to get even better with easier to use things.
Learning to drive stick shift makes it easier to drive automatic.
Learning APCR makes it easier to use APDS and APFSDS.
These are facts of life.
1 Like
My name is intentionally provocative? Yes my name is provocative. I made my name since I don’t care what my name is on a game called War Thunder. So what? Funny name ≠ troll. Calling you out ≠ Intentional provocation
And again, I’ve replied to you aswell, you also still fail to counter my points from previously.
- You don’t need to intentionally torture yourself to get better. The learning curve for APCR is deeper than every other shell and its very unnecessary to do.
- You’re really comparing drive stick shift/drive automatic to APCR and APDS/APFSDS?
- Again, they’re entirely different. APFSDS and APDS not only have greater angled penetration, but more spall. APCR is entirely different. At top tier, you just have to learn to shoot the LFP and Turret ring and you’d be set.
I know forcing yourself to learn is learning, but intentionally doing something hard to “achieve something” is unnecessary.
And no, those are not false accusations. Everytime I check the forum, a new post about the Abrams or US things, you’re there making a statement that is very infuriating. If anything, you’d be the one who is intentionally provoking, or as you say, trolling.
Oh yeah, one more thing.
Training APFSDS and APDS like you’re using APCR, or as you compare it, drive stick shift to automatic driving might actually hinder you.
You’re being so careful with your shots you don’t take the ones that can get you a kill. Drive stick shifting can also hinder automatic driving, since your brain might automatically make you think “shift gear!” but you don’t have to. Some people prefer shortcuts.
You’re infuriated at me after I defend the Abrams, I support increasing the hitpoints of baskets and autoloaders, Abrams turret ring getting fixed, and other general buffs to the Abrams platform…
Wild.
BTW M304 round has as-good 60 degree pen as M82 at ranges 100 meters and closer, and only slightly worse further out, but that’s off-topic.
1 Like
Oh so now we’re just mocking eachother. Real fancy. Anyway, ima play the game real quick
So it’s hilarious that you’re afraid of change because I’m constantly advocating for change? This made sense to you when you typed it?
I was drunk, sorry.