he literally showed that you said word for word what he claimed you said… Maybe stop lying when everyone can see it by just looking one post above… That is why I call you alier… Because you do it constantly and in almost every single post you make
understandable
In case you’re referring to the russian t-series tanks you mean the tanks where 2 crew are magically floating above an autoloader (all without a turret basket so far…russian magic until it is implemented and will get immediately buffed because only then players will fully understand how dumb its current implementation is) which you can shoot right through without a fatal explosion because russian tank designers somehow could forsee that exactly the thickness they are using for those plates will be the thickness that like 20 years later gaijin will use as the cutoff from armor creating spall to armor not creating spall. So you will have to hit the propellant charges directly and can even shoot right underneath it from the front taking out only its engine while an apfsds round travelled right through the whole fighting compartment (tbf just above the tanks floor but still)?
If anything now paper tanks that really require no precision aiming to pen and their only saving grace considering survivability in citybrawls was being bigger with 4 crew and them being more spaced out so you could still get lucky and at least be able to shoot back if either your gunner or commander survived the turret baskets made sure that all of those now are certain oneshots center of mass or at least cant shoot back after being hit basically anywhere where they get penned. which is a lot of the area from the front. Basically survivability for leos and abrams went from: “Don’t get shot at and if, hope you get lucky” to “dont get shot at cause if you get hit anywhere except for unbelievably bad shots, youre dead unless the guy shooting messed up completely”
While shooting at T series tanks it’s even a diceroll when hitting the tiny weakspots. Kinda dumb but i honestly didnt expect more from the snail after playing the leos after the barrel depression nerf not being able to shoot at 0 ° elevation for more than 90° from the front because realism. Man if we crave realism so much why am i bumbrushin in close quarter city abandoned whatever maps in more than 50% of my matches with engagement distances of 200 m?
1 Like
That’s not what a sump pump is… or even a sump for that matter.
I’ve aimed at driver hatches of T-90s with my abrams M735 (uptier) and somehow miraculously ricochet off the ring
Yeah I mean weird stuff happens to any tank you can shoot at in this game and it depends wildly how you perceive it of which nation you’re currently playing. I still find its kinda funny that in an attempt to make the game more consistent (much appreciated imo) the snail then proceeds to go only half way (i mean i kinda am sure theyre planning adding turret baskets for all tanks that have them but i’ll only believe it when i see them on the t80s). Or buildings somehow turned invisible by apparently being destroyed but theyre actually not so you see the tanks behind but cant shoot them. Ammo exploding or maybe not. Fuel tank explosion probability being linked to crew survivability. Suddenly desync issues offsetting everything for a couple of 100 ms making shots at moving targets dicerolls (without being able to tell beforehand if servers are desynched or not). Almost makes you want to watch their esport matches and see people getting gaijinned competitively
The weird things that can happen shooting at russian tanks almost makes you think of only shooting at them if youve got an option to reverse into safety just in case your clean shot decides to do absolutely nothing. i mean i shot right through the driver port of a t-something with top tier apfsds and damaged only its engine. dont ask me how, dont ask me why but i wouldve never guessed that that could happen. worst case i would have guessed engine and driver but only the engine…idk man. Sometimes apfsds to the top of the turret roof yeets 2 crew sometimes a 90 degree flat shot right through the whole tank and its autoloader does absolutely nothing. Consistency defined.
@_Baum
Glad you agree with me that I said this:
Yet you make false accusations against me all because I said those things.
Is there a day you ever stop chronically falsely accusing others?
Never agreed to that. You are once again trying to take stuff utterly out of context and rebuild it in your own fantasy world. That is not how an argument works. You need to seriously stop and learn how to read properlöy and understand what is being said, because you miss around 95% of what people are saying and then run from there with your 5% of understanding to always end up with utterly wrong conclusions.
It is quite frankly amazing how a person literally living on an online discussion board for the past 5+ years has not managed to learn that simple skill and yet claims to have gotten a formal education in an analytical field.
Ah yes please enlighten me where in your post the words “HP, Autoloader or Buff” are contained.
Your brain is working in strange ways. You cite a post about the performance of APCR and somehow that is you saying “Buff HP of autoloaders” without once using any of these words XD
Utter fantasy world once again
He says as he literally misses what others are saying for the third time in a row…
Nah no one can help you. You are delusional and or trolling. there is no other way
It’s sad.
All I did was come here and show my support for improving the hitpoints of baskets and autoloaders.
Instead of agreeing with me, and acknowledging that those buffs should occur, people would rather attack and provoke me.
1 Like
No you did not
Post 121 remains the subject and does not contain anything of what you claim.
Literally my 2nd post on the topic saying that hitpoints should be buffed.
You made false implications against the War Thunder community for wanting autoloaders, baskets, and other modules modeled on tanks.
Post 121 isn’t even my post, that’s a post 2 posts above.
This is the post we are talking about and no other
Это пост, о котором мы говорим, и никакой другой.
这是我们在谈论的帖子，没有其他的。
Dies ist der Beitrag, über den wir sprechen, und kein anderer.
C’est le post dont nous parlons, et aucun autre.
Este es el post del que estamos hablando y ningún otro.
これは私たちが話している投稿であり、他の投稿ではありません。
Surely one of these he will finally understand.
1 Like
@_Baum
Did I say what is quoted?
If you say yes then you agree with me I said that about 90mm APCR despite falsely accusing me.
If you say no, then you deny reality all for an attempt to disagree with me.
1 Like
Nope. That is once again your fantasy. I stated nothing towards you, other than that the other guy proved that you lied by quoting you from another threat. My statement is exclusively about the fact that someone else proved that you have been lying a lot on this forum. And has no bearing on anything you said in the quoted part. That is how the english language works.
The Post is prove that you lied. It is not a statement of my opinion regarding your opinion on APCR or anything else.
Learn how to english before you wrongly english all over the english forum you unable to speak and comprehend english attempting englisher.
@_Baum
Me: “I said these things about 90mm APCR.”
The other guy: “Yes you did, here’s a screenshot.”
So because he and I proved I said those things about 90mm APCR we’re liars? Grow up, dude.
We have the proof I said those things, you have no proof to the contrary.
So you’ll do number 2: You’ll claim I never said things about 90mm APCR, denying reality, all for an attempt to disagree with me instead of accepting the evidence.
And you have the audacity to falsely accuse others…
1 Like
Please take this to PM’s, not here
2 Likes
arab
Well yeah, I hesitate shooting russian tanks because either I get their LFP, and turn them into firecrackers, or my shell gets absolutely mauled by non-existent armor.