Never agreed to that. You are once again trying to take stuff utterly out of context and rebuild it in your own fantasy world. That is not how an argument works. You need to seriously stop and learn how to read properlöy and understand what is being said, because you miss around 95% of what people are saying and then run from there with your 5% of understanding to always end up with utterly wrong conclusions.
It is quite frankly amazing how a person literally living on an online discussion board for the past 5+ years has not managed to learn that simple skill and yet claims to have gotten a formal education in an analytical field.
Ah yes please enlighten me where in your post the words “HP, Autoloader or Buff” are contained.
Your brain is working in strange ways. You cite a post about the performance of APCR and somehow that is you saying “Buff HP of autoloaders” without once using any of these words XD
Utter fantasy world once again
He says as he literally misses what others are saying for the third time in a row…
Nah no one can help you. You are delusional and or trolling. there is no other way
If you say yes then you agree with me I said that about 90mm APCR despite falsely accusing me.
If you say no, then you deny reality all for an attempt to disagree with me.
Nope. That is once again your fantasy. I stated nothing towards you, other than that the other guy proved that you lied by quoting you from another threat. My statement is exclusively about the fact that someone else proved that you have been lying a lot on this forum. And has no bearing on anything you said in the quoted part. That is how the english language works.
The Post is prove that you lied. It is not a statement of my opinion regarding your opinion on APCR or anything else.
Learn how to english before you wrongly english all over the english forum you unable to speak and comprehend english attempting englisher.
@_Baum
Me: “I said these things about 90mm APCR.”
The other guy: “Yes you did, here’s a screenshot.”
So because he and I proved I said those things about 90mm APCR we’re liars? Grow up, dude.
We have the proof I said those things, you have no proof to the contrary.
So you’ll do number 2: You’ll claim I never said things about 90mm APCR, denying reality, all for an attempt to disagree with me instead of accepting the evidence.
And you have the audacity to falsely accuse others…
Well yeah, I hesitate shooting russian tanks because either I get their LFP, and turn them into firecrackers, or my shell gets absolutely mauled by non-existent armor.
And that isn’t even the reason, you literally said “people have been begging for this for realism” more like people want something to prevent their entire crew being nuked by a LFP shot, with the turret basket (IRL being designed for that) being added hopefully fixing it. But no, it made the turret ring problem much worse.
I’m infuriated more over your utterly deranged takes, and more like “APCR is great for training” it’s more like torturing yourself until you learn.
Turret baskets should’ve never been implemented like this, just like it was for spall liners. Another garbage, half-baked mechanic introduction that cucks over a select few tanks.
Gaijin trying not to be malicious challenge; Difficulty level Impossible
